<p>when will we find out which 1 is the experimental</p>
<p>I'd say 600-620. If it's a really harsh curve probably 600.</p>
<p>when you say "harsh" do you mean that the math section was hard or easy</p>
<p>Oh yeah! I think the dog and cat question was something about students owning dogs and cats. Some own one, some own both. Then how many own both, but I cant remember how many students there were.</p>
<p>A harsh curve means the section was easy and more people got a higher raw score.</p>
<p>25 students</p>
<p>i had experimental verbal, which means that dog question must be apart of experimental math.</p>
<p>haha thanks wicked smaaht...im guessing your from boston ha</p>
<p>okay good.
Okay, anyone want to predict my math?
1 omit, 2-4 mc wrong.</p>
<p>For the one with the car (50% were red, 60% had four doors, and 70% had alloy rims) What did you all get? I got 28. Since the probability of not choosing a red car and not having four doors and having alloy wheels is (.5<em>.4</em>.7 = .14) therfore the number of cars = .14*200 = 28.</p>
<p>Logically the answer seemed 80 and that's what I put earlier but then I couldn't draw the venn diagrams to justify them.</p>
<p>For the one with the car (50% were red, 60% had four doors, and 70% had alloy rims) What did you all get? I got 28. Since the probability of not choosing a red car and not having four doors and having alloy wheels is (.5<em>.4</em>.7 = .14) therfore the number of cars = .14*200 = 28.</p>
<p>Logically the answer seemed 80 and that's what I put earlier but then I couldn't draw the venn diagrams to justify them</p>
<p>well think of it this way.</p>
<p>50 percent red = 100
60 percent had four doors = 120
70 percent had alloy rims = 140</p>
<p>So does 80 work? Green cars with two doors and alloy rims? It's green so we know it has to be at least less than 100. But since it has two doors, and 120 have four, we know it has to be at least less than or equal to 80. 80 satisfies all conditions. </p>
<p>Let's say it was 81. If 81 cars had two doors, that means 119 have four, but we are told that 120 have four, so... it works. it's 80</p>
<p>The questoin had nothing to do with probability.
80 was the smallest number between teh three.</p>
<p>will the verbal be leniant, id found it pretty tough</p>
<p>haha, yeah I'm from Boston dukesoph.</p>
<p>xoeoeix, i dunno, thats for the verbal thread. it was rather hard though</p>
<p>so if you had two maths, was the experimental section section 4? i sure hope so.</p>
<p>That's what everyone is guessing. What makes section 4 more likely to be experimental than section 3 though? I couldn't tell.</p>
<p>did sec. 4 have question about the average chairs produce or was that in section 3</p>
<p>not sure? but i do remember having that question.</p>
<p>i thought it was because i got an a,b,c,d,c,b,a which was wierd (and could have been wrong) and because that last question was bizzare to me.</p>
<p>im pretty sure section 3</p>