@Lookingforward asks some very good questions. I don’t understand why people assume that adcoms are prejudiced against introverts or why they think all introverts are the same. Adcoms only see what the applicant chooses to present, and I think there are introverts who have competitive activities and extroverts who don’t. And either can miss the mark on how to best present them. That’s not the adcoms fault.
I question the premise of the article. The writer doesn’t understand introversion and the examples they give to prove their point are pretty weak. It looks like a rehash of previous comments from the report. Last week they were used to “prove” Harvard discriminated against Asians. This week they “prove” they discriminate against introverts. I think they’re trying to squeeze every last angle out of the report so they can get one more story.
The article also says this:
I don’t see anything in the article to support this statement and I don’t believe it’s true. What does a student gain by joining as many groups as possible AND being president of all of them? More importantly, what would they be able to contribute by spreading themselves so thinly? Why would a college want a campus full of students who “dominate” every conversation? How does that add to the campus environment?