<p>Hey'd anyone else see the new stats on PSU. Came out today. Now over 90,000 students enrolled at the campuses, with over 42K at UP.</p>
<p>btw, toneyranger, I'm positive I'm inferior to a great many people, but I keep trying. ;) but on the $$ thing, you're off base. had a wonderful scholarship, job there, etc. actually made $$ for which I'm most grateful. Again, though, none of that calls me over the blue and white cliff with our fellow lemmings to proclaim what a grand academic experience it was. it was what it is. no more no less. but the PSU model for education is imo so inferior to so many other options simply because it is statistically impossible for virtually all to have any type of highly engaging intellectual experience ... UNLESS ... as you've noted, one goes and gets it. in which case, one can get the very same experience for the most part, at Lock Haven, Stony Brook, Maine at Farmington, etc. Learning is not limited to what one is fed if one is willing and motivated to go and get what they want. Is this reality for most 18 and20 year olds? I think we all know that answer. there are 2 primary determinants in why Penn State enrolls 90K students today vs. the 4 or 5 K of the 50s... NOT because it's a superior way to educate individuals, but rather because it's a cost effective way to educate the masses, and like the PSU news release noted today, the U needs $$ to pursue its mission of research (meaning virtually anything BUT supporting undergraduate education.</p>
<p>If one seeks a Ph.D. in ceramic science, meteorology, or ag engineering, super! None bettern PSU. but imo, trying to build a case that a PSU undergraduate education ... for most, nearly all ... comes close to the kind of academic experience a student can have at a Davidson, Reed, College of NJ, Webb Institute, Connecticut College, Wm & Mary ... aside from personal, emotional, and on many fronts pleasant testimony which is anecdotal ... is improbable. Do I doubt that Joe Undergrad had a more "collegiate" good time with the football games, hoops, and a sense of "THIS is college" in walking around the Nit Lion on a sunny Saturday vs. looking across the bay to Manhattan from the campus of Stevens Tech? Nah, I don't doubt that at all ... been there done both. No comparison.</p>
<p>But ... do I doubt that collectively Stevens Techers got a superior one on one BS in nanotechnology or EE. Nope. Careful scrutiny would reveal the hard truth that is simply too difficult for many PSUers (and many many other mega institutional grads) to swallow. It ain't gonna happen. Most will not be willing or able to afford that possibility. </p>
<p>But were it to happen, it would be no call to shame or disgrace. Again, it simply is what it is. And that's plenty wonderful for a whole lot of people, and that's the very good news, because economics tells us with certainty that the proportion of all college students going to the Penn States will be even greater in 2020 than it is in 2008. Just like in 2008 it's hugely greater than it was in 1975. </p>
<p>One note: We've shown for many years now that we ARE willing to pay for automobiles that last, houses that are in the right location, location, location, and jeans that shout the right label. Increasingly, with the exception of the intellectual and financial elite of our nation, we've said with our feet and checkbooks ... there IS NOT ENOUGh evidence that Lehigh at 150K pricing is sufficiently worth that and thus the PSUs become the default mode. And what I think most are saying, it's not a bad default mode for lots of reasons. My contention is that FOR MOST that reason cannot be because they received a superior academic experience.</p>