One shot? Two shot? Any shot??

<p>ok.. good use of problem solving skill. Glad y'alls got that out of the way. anyone else think admissions are a crapshoot??? well... in two day... New SAT scores!! I B Excited!</p>

<p>isn't it objectively true that tisch admission puts far less weight on SAT scores? tischies do get some leeway as far as academics concerned. but that is not to say, tisch is any less competitive or presitigious than any other NYU school. Tischies just have a different field of expertise than other students. filmmakers certainly don't make their names by earning nobel prizes.
so yea, tisch does have a lower average SAT score, but that doesn't mean much.</p>

<p>thanks, thats all i was trying to say</p>

<p>"isn't it objectively true that tisch admission puts far less weight on SAT scores?"</p>

<p>No.</p>

<p>"so yea, tisch does have a lower average SAT score, but that doesn't mean much."</p>

<p>If this is "objectively true" could you please provide the evidence with which you make that assertion? If you can't then you are just making assumptions, and nothing else.</p>

<p>
[quote]
"isn't it objectively true that tisch admission puts far less weight on SAT scores?"</p>

<p>No.
[quote]
</p>

<p>i wonder what is your reasoning behind such a confident "No". you could probably call up the admissions office and ask them if you need concrete evidences. it is too obvious that CAS, stern, tisch and all other schools take in students of different calibers. you'd be (extremely) wrong to say that someone who got into tisch will be able to gain stern or vice versa.</p>

<p>actors are not businessmen. they are judged on different bases. im sorry if it is hard for you to understand, but that the reality.</p>

<p>Did you seriously just pull that out of your ass because you couldn't answer my question? Did you think trying to ask me a question you couldn't answer in the first place was a legitamite reply? Yes (and I say that quite confidently :) ).</p>

<p>I guess your right, sternies couldn't match Tisch standards. Sorry, but "that the reality". I'll just have to learn to except it. <em>sigh</em> ;)</p>

<p>I see there is no point in arguing with you. first learn to present your ideas in more logical ways, then I may reply to your posts.
plus, your grammer strongly suggests that some tischies, not all, clearly do not quite meet the standards for admission to NYU.</p>

<p>...<em>cough</em>...I was quoting you and therefore pointing out your bad grammar. Nice one, Einstein.</p>

<p>And if we are going to get into a pointless fight, we may as well keep going.</p>

<p>You say that I can't present my arguments logically, and yet your the one who couldn't answer my simple question that was only asked in order that you could back up your previous argument with tangible facts. So, you tried to turn the tables by basically rephrasing the exact same question to me, which didn't work and only proves that you had absolutely no facts to back up your assertions because they were the opitome of proverbial ****. </p>

<p>And by the way, in the English language, proper grammar consits of capitalized letters at the beginning of each sentence. Kisses! ;)</p>

<p>((deleted))</p>

<p>nevermind. im glad god shared his infinite knowledge of everything in the world with you lindsey. the humility too. looks good on you.</p>

<p>Thanks, because providing evidence for an argument in order to make my point while others can't apparently means that I think I know everything. At least it compliments my looks. :)</p>

<p>ok. well, we have really got off topic. If y'alls wanna argue, argue in the neighboring threads. </p>

<p>Updates.
Old SAT: CR 580 Math 690 Writing 550
New SAT: CR 640 Math 680 Writing 650
Any thoughts? Still sux,i know</p>