Oxbridge

<p>How is an Oxbridge MBA program perceived in the US compared to UCLA or USC. While Oxbridge as a whole have preeminent global reputations, I am concern that the relative young age of their MBA may not carry as much weight in the US as established domestic programs. Oxbridge are attractive options because of their global repute, an international experience and the one year length of the program.</p>

<p>What is the CC community perception of Said and Judge? Even though their MBA programs are not as highly rank as their US peer institutions, their admitted class profiles statistics are climbing every year. This is a promising sign that Oxbridge may reach the upper echelons of MBA programs in the near future if they are not there already. If you had the option of going to USC, UCLA or Oxbridge, which would you choose? More importantly, if you are a recruiter, how would you differentiate the strengths and weaknesses of these programs? Thanks guys.</p>

<p>Well, I think you already captured the essence of the argument. Oxford and Cambridge do have pre-eminent names. Their MBA programs are not well-established (yet), but that may not really matter. </p>

<p>It really depends on what type of job you want to pursue afterwards. For example, if you want a traditional MBA-type job (i.e. consulting, Ibanking) that has the traditional recruiting path, then you are probably better off going to a well-established MBA program. On the other hand, if you plan to search for your own job, or otherwise plan to enter an industry that does not really conduct traditional MBA recruiting, then Oxbridge may well be the way to go. </p>

<p>I'll give you a case in point. I know a guy who got his MBA at MIT and wanted to work in Asia. This is a white guy who speaks no Asian languages. Most companies even in the US - to say nothing about those in Asia - know that MIT even has a business school, despite it being ranked the #4 MBA program according to US News. But people do know the MIT brand name. You graduate from MIT, even with a business degree, and people are just going to assume that you're a technical genius. He was able to find a job in Asia with relative ease (heading up the Asian operations of a small US manufacturer), by leveraging the MIT brand name.</p>

<p>But the key was that he was willing to do his own networking to get a job. If he wanted to get a job in traditional Ibanking, then something like HBS would be better. </p>

<p>
[quote]
If you had the option of going to USC, UCLA or Oxbridge, which would you choose?

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Well, I would choose Oxbridge, not only because I tend to prefer non-traditional jobs, but also because Oxbridge is only 1 year long whereas the others are 2 years long. In fact, for that reason alone, I would turn down Oxbridge only for a top 10 US MBA (2-year) program. </p>

<p>
[quote]
More importantly, if you are a recruiter, how would you differentiate the strengths and weaknesses of these programs?

[/quote]
</p>

<p>As a recruiter, you would note that Oxbridge's MBA students are probably not as good, on average, as the students at a top-ranked MBA program. On the other hand, you would also note that the Oxbridge general brand name is extremely strong, and that an Oxbridge MBA grad will have alumni connections to the vaunted Oxbridge network.</p>

<p>Are you a recruiter, Sakky? That would make sense.</p>

<p>Maybe I am, Wildflower. Are you a HBS grad?</p>

<p>Maybe I am, Sakky. Would you hire me? WE in M&A IB, PE & VC.</p>

<p>You are an HBS grad? In which section and what was your section nickname? Which EC courses did you take?</p>

<p>Sigh. Sakky, again, want my social security too? But, let's see: power & I; moral leader; VC/PE; CDD. Fav. prof is Margolis. Happy? Your turn.</p>

<p>Uh, those are not sections. I asked you what your section was and its nickname.</p>

<p>LMAO @ you two posting back and forth so quickly that you answered questions before they were asked (posts are not in proper order above).</p>

<p>"Uh, those are not sections. I asked you what your section was and its nickname."</p>

<p>Didn't you say EC courses, Sakky? I am not giving you my section. It should be obvious I deliberately ignored such a personal question.</p>

<p>Why would you say it's personal? Telling me your section reveals practically nothing about you, as I won't even know what year you supposedly graduated. In any case, I can hardly see how section information is more personal than your favorite EC course (by the way, of those 4 that you listed, do you know which of them had final exams?). </p>

<p>Of course, if you don't even know what a section nickname is, then that's a different story.</p>

<p>hi everyone this is shubham chharia i m from India i need ur help…
I want to do MBA from uk n i get offer from Oxbridge college of london…
so plzz help me that is oxbridge college is gud for MBA…
may i do MBA from Oxbridge college is it gud for placement also…
plzz help me to suggest about oxbrideg college…</p>

<p>In finance, nobody cares about Oxbridge, let alone colleges there.</p>

<p>Oxbridge college of london is a fine school.</p>

<p>You sure you passed the TOEFL bro?</p>