<p>Happy ending! As son was riding into the parking lot, Coach was pulling out. He made the hand-off and won't receive the obligation. </p>
<p>I "blame" the difference in my kids grades on several things. </p>
<p>First, I believe in the boy/girl learning differences and the educational setting being more suitable to girls. </p>
<p>Next, I made a "novice parent error of inaction" when Son was in 3rd grade. He needed to be in the 97th percentile to place in the highest GnT program. But, being "only" 96%, he placed in the next level down. This placement stuck with him all the way through middle school. I later came to find out that most of the kids in the "high" GnT program were there on parent petition. They actually scored lower than Son's 96. If I had petitioned for him, perhaps the extra challenge would have led to overall better study habits or earlier APs in HS. Son has actually said to me that, in hindsight, he wishes I had fought for him to be in that special 3rd grade group. :(</p>
<p>Son was born at 34 weeks gestation. Daughter had 36.5 weeks. I think that little difference factors in their brain power. Likewise for athletic ability. D is the stronger athlete and was always the healthier baby. No asthma, but Son's lungs have always been "weakish." (To balance D's athletics, Son got a very powerful music talent.)</p>
<p>Born pre-FMLA, I could only take off 6 weeks of work and breast feed Son until his orignial due date. With D being born post-FMLA and at a later gestational age, I could take off 12 weeks of work. This allowed me breast feed her until 2 months passed her due date. </p>
<p>Is there real science at work here? Or just Mommy's guilt? Who knows. Probably a little of each. But, I don't mind. They're both "perfect" kids to me. I wouldn't "fix" anything about either. :)</p>
<p>ETA: I just realized I overlooked a question. No, D's 9th grade load isn't lighter, by comparison, to Son's. She is taking all honors, mostly 10th grade stuff. He's got 2 APs, 3 H, and one regular.</p>