@snoozn lol, thanks. I would agree that we don’t “need” one however when the free offer presented itself, why not. It has done a couple of things. It opened up the geographical constraints. I’m not sure that will hold but it did allow for some list expansion. They may have been schools I’d have found, maybe not, I have been a bit more narrowly focused program wise and it did add more “general” options to the list which is probably good as S could well go a different direction.
If I am honest with myself I probably limited it a bit to help minimize that…I would prefer a degree that has better employment opportunity rather than just what is fun to study. I’d like it to be both mind you but it is simply harder with certain degrees.
She also validated several schools I’d been pushing him to consider (gently) and now they are officially on the list. That was helpful! She did pick some though that definitely hit things that were deal breakers for him and they came right off. She will need to work on the more subtle things that are important to certain kids and not just look at programs, stats and location. The (hopefully) real benefit is that in theory she nags and keeps him on track with common app and essays and they will do some non mom nagging essay review.
I tend to go overboard with metrics. S17 would probably die if he saw the sheet (he gets the abbreviated version). He knows how I work and would laugh but wouldn’t want to look at all that data. Right now my spreadsheet tracks and then weights the following factors and we end up with a stacked rank list that is based on FIT score + RANK score
Reach, Match or Safety has been determined but doesn’t impact the stack ranking. That is based on published stats and our Naviance. Which do not always line up so that is interesting and there are 2 schools on the list no one has ever applied to, one with only 2 kids so I am not sure how meaningful Naviance is in those scenarios.
Just for kicks…here is what I look at.
FIT
S17 criteria +
Program options variety/strength +
Cost criteria +
Mom’s criteria
*= FIT Score *
S17’s criteria
*Trees, Mountains, Rain, Snow, upper half of the country (or really upper 1/4-1/3) No hot sun, humid, dessert
*Pretty campus, preferably traditional collegiate in feel, Cool college town or close to urban activities but not necessary right in a big city.
*Not in hometown.
*Liberal, or at least not conservative, green (with an obvious emphasis on it), LGBTQ friendly and overall tolerant in general. Not religious.
Program options variety/strength that I track are
*ENVS/Energy/Policy BA Options
*ENSC/Energy/Policy BS Options
*Environmental Engineering
*Energy/Renewable/Sustainable Engineering
*Other Interesting Related Programs and minors/dual majors
Cost Criteria. I’ve run NPC on every school. I believe I’ve run it conservatively and hope that in the case of LAC’s there is a bit more money out there, we have a non contributing NCP that will have to be documented and college tuition we cannot count on the other side and I am hoping that a profile school will have some flexibility there but we will see.
Of course when it comes down to it, cost will be a huge driving factor and I can do all the ranking I want but we could end up looking at all safeties or low matches as frankly that’s all we know we can afford. The current list breaks out into thirds, financial safeties, ones with a gap that could possibly be surmountable with slightly better offers and ones that one paper we should perhaps not bother even applying to.
Mom’s criteria is entirely subjective based on cost/program and rank, adding in where I want to pay to travel to (or not) or my general gut feeling about a location so is a bit of double counting to be sure but it’s my spreadsheet. LOL!
RANK
USNWR A for B
4 yr Grad Rate %
4 yr Loan Default %
Economist Median $
PR “Green” School y/n?
Payscale ROI Engineering
Payscale ROI Non Engineering
How many of these they “hit” my completely subjective target score for each is counted and that number becomes the Ranking Score
And yes. I overthink everything.