My son has several friends who went to Hope from his school. They all seem happy there! Some are likely to go this round also.
I agree the scholarship weekends are a burden. I don’t mind it as much for the ones that narrow down to true finalists before invites (say, a 35-50% chance of winning from those there for the weekend), try to schedule it on the actual weekend preferably Friday night and all day Saturday, and make it fair in terms of interview teams.
The last one we went to, at a school that I really think is best for S23, had hundreds of finalists for 10 awards. S23 had an ACT 8 points higher than the “cut-off” to be at the weekend. It was all fairly well done, and the adults in my group were impressed with it all, but then it took a turn when they seem to have randomly assigned students to interviewers because with hundreds of “finalists”, you cannot have the same teams interview all the students.
S23 was with two physical education professors (both female at a college with a male-dominated faculty.) He is not going to be an athlete in college and has little to do with athletics. It did not go well and put him off the school a little since he felt insulted that he didn’t even rate one academic interviewer. We adults are upset because it seems unfair on several levels, and we are involved enough in small LAC higher education to have seen that when the voting/discussion occurs, higher ranking faculty have more sway for the candidates they support.
We (self, husband, mom, biological father) all still hope he chooses this school with the merit he already has, but we cannot on any level understand what they were thinking. He is among the top students applying to this school and has connections to it. How did they not have him interviewed more appropriately? The answer, I think, is just too many people present without vetting them enough and narrowing it down before the weekend. We are not holding our collective breath for the results.
As someone said above, the college is using it primarily as a recruiting tool and only secondarily to hand out some scholarships, whereas families who paid money and took the time to get there are expecting it to be primarily a clear, fair competition. I have seen such weekends done well with D17, but that was at state flagship weekends for full-ride, named awards. Even in those cases, it cost money and time, but at least the chances to win were high and the structure was designed to be as fair as possible with all candidates meeting/being interviewed by the same committee.