<p>We know the world is coming to an end, soon, when decisions are made on assumptions. How in the world are you judging a school because of your assumption that on the weekends, people don’t exist. Given your account of intelligence, most Europeans also think Americans are stupid, naive, and dumb for the most part. We might as well start adhering to their assumptions as well. Stony Brook has a ton of events going on during the weekend, and plenty of people out of it’s ~25K student body on campus. If you want to have a good time, you can have it. </p>
<p>Back to academics, I repeat, Binghamton is NOT on the same tier as Stony Brook when it comes to Sciences. This is a fact backed by sources, backed by results, backed by competitions, backed by alumni. Refer to my previous post. Stony Brook is tough, with great on campus recruitment, with an amazing reputation for dispatching students to top-notch Science-oriented grad school. Given Bing’s poor performance in Science, if you wish to major in a field like a Computer Science, Biology, Chemistry, Earth Science, Biomedical Engineering, Geology, Physics, Astronomy, Pure Math, Applied Math, and the list goes on, and on, and on, it would be, and I hate to say this, frankly put, the dumbest decision of your life, given not only our results, and higher rankings, better known faculty, and last but not least RESOURCES(which I outlined earlier).</p>
<p>“Hi Mom, yeah, I know Stony Brook has a top 20 Math, Computer Science, Physics, and other Science programs, but my friend Jake, who heard from Jane, who was told by her cousins boyfriend, who was told by the pizza delivery said Stony Brook sucks on the weekend, so I will go to Bing, which has the same programs in the top 200(around the ballpark of 100’ish), and study some Science field like Chemistry over there. It might be a better decision Mom, but, but, after all, it was JAKE who told me!”.</p>
<p>Look at A)Rankings, B)Faculty size, and quality. C)Resources. D)Results E)Alumni </p>
<p>In the Sciences, and make an informed decisions.</p>
<p>Caveat:
I am not trying to say Binghamton is peanuts, it’s a great school. But Binghamton was never meant to be a Science-oriented school. That was and still is, and given our ongoing HEAVY investments will remain Stony Brooks job, with our world-renowned national lab, to be fair Stony Brook is neglecting it’s humanities and Liberal Arts, whereas Bing neglects it’s more hard Science fields. Bing’s job has been more humanities and liberal arts. You don’t here a Stony Brook student bragging about how good of a business school Stony has, where as Bing might have a better business, or say Anthropology department. Leave the Sciences for Stony Brook, and students who are interested in a tough, challenging, academic fueling Science-oriented environment should consider Stony Brook. It’s something we’ve been doing well for a long time, thanks to our 3 campuses and BNL. Our hard work is paying off, we know sit with elite ranks of Harvard, MIT, Yale, Princeton in various rankings, and our competition results, thanks in-part to our resources and students speak miles. I refer you back to the world prestigious, toughest global Math exam, where Harvard is #1, MIT #2, and yours truly Stony Brook is #4. I wouldn’t be surprised if you don’t find Bing no where near the top 500(if they even participated that is). These kind of results are honestly regular for us in Science. From nurturing 10-20 intel finalists a year, etc, etc.</p>
<p><a href=“http://sb.cc.stonybrook.edu/happenings/student-spotlight/putnam-competition/[/url]”>http://sb.cc.stonybrook.edu/happenings/student-spotlight/putnam-competition/</a></p>
<p>Best,</p>