<p>Can knowledge be a burden rather than a benefit?</p>
<pre><code> Knowledge cannot be a burden alone.if knowledge was a burden, it must also be a benefit. In contrast, knowledge can be a forte without being a foible.
Scientists, doctors and other researchers in different fields have striven to acquire knowledge since the time of human's birth, like Aristotle and Galileo. They passed their cognizance down the generations to much later discoverers and inventors, like Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Edison. In the present era, inheritors, like Steve Jobs and Walt Disney, have carried the burden of delivering their experience to future innovators -after all, people did benefit form apple devices exuberantly. Until today, and for the future to come, researchers will preserve to bequeath their knowledge to the future generation.
Imperceptibly, scientists first thought that gathering cognizance and inventing paraphernalia would facilitate theirs and others life. Instead of unraveling most of the abstruse and illuminating most of the obscure, the continuously acquired knowledge of sciences constantly reveals more profound spaces to discover and more intricate labyrinths to peer. The more researchers dig into knowledge, the more the hole gets deeper.
Although the more erudite people the more they acknowledge their lack of information, science has paid of by affecting individuals' daily life and lubricating its wheels. Cognizance may be a burden sometimes, but it is a soluble jawbreaker, and as soon as it melts, its savoring taste prevails.
</code></pre>