Porcupine critical reading

<p>Did I totally misinterpret the whole moral of the story or something.... I thought the whole story was criticizing the porcupine woman, but it seems a lot of people thought it was about the beaver's "ill conceived consent."</p>

<p>It was both. The story explicitly divided the moral into 2 paragraphs - one of which warned about getting into hasty agreements, and the other about the porcupine woman's lack of preparation.</p>

<p>if it was both how would you answet the question about what the moral of the story was?</p>

<p>It was "warn against ill-conceived assent". The Q asked about the moral of the story in relation to LAW. Any other choice would have made any sense.</p>

<p>wat were the other choices again?</p>

<p>No, it was example of traditional practices, as pertains directly to law. Did you miss the paragraph where they use SPECIFIC legal examples? How the beaver made a contract by agreeing, how the porcupine woman was within her rights when the beaver went back on his contract, they used all sorts of LEGAL examples. Morally it served as a warning of ill conceived assent, but not LEGALLY.</p>

<p>The.End,</p>

<p>How is warning fellow Native Americans against making hasty legal agreements NOT relevant to law? </p>

<p>If it were an example of traditional practices, then the tradtional practice would have been the ACTUAL ill-conceived assent. This would imply that the tradional practice w/in the Native American community was to make hasty agreements. However, that is certainly not the social or legal moral of the story.</p>

<p>i put"warn against ill-conceived assent"</p>

<p>so did I....</p>

<p>and what did u put for the function of mentioning the way of the bear or something like that</p>

<p>It had a foreboding effect that foreshadowed a new danger for the porcupine woman.</p>

<p>a new peril right? i put that one as well:D</p>

<p>Hey,your discussion reminds me of the June SAT that I took last year.</p>

<p>I put new peril as well as the ill-conceived assent; found it to be most relevant in the legal sense.</p>

<p>whoa this was given in june too.... but in canada or sumtin</p>

<p>In Canada and in Vietnam.;).In any other country?</p>

<p>what did you guys put for that question where one of the answers was women in comparison to her goals and her actual situation?</p>

<p>Merudh, I believe that was the answer I put.</p>

<p>yeah, I said the same thing, but there was another answer I had thought might have worked.</p>

<p>nice...we're doin good. Only possible 3 wrong so far...I can still get above 750. WOOO</p>