<p>Oh my gosh, this is why it is so frustrating to talk to you mr muffin. You talk about your facts and how you can support everything and then DON'T. I offer examples and you say, "nice claim, where's the evidence?" Examples are evidence. You cannot easily say porn makes people less aggressive, more loving, and think more about protection because it is disputed by FACTS. EVIDENCE (in this case, the countless examples) suggest the opposite. Nobody will believe you and they shouldn't - true. Millions agree with my point of view and what I said above and the should. Tylenol does not have the inherent danger or potential for abuse that pornography does. One has physical effects only, the other is a total mind-altering drug of sorts. The point about the porn industry's abuse and the abused women who are drawn to it is to say sexual abuse as a child creates poor self-images in which victimized women see themselves as good for only satisfying the sexual desires of men. They see them as objects. Thus they go to pornography in some cases, showing that that is how the industry treats them. They are broken, disturbed women in the industry who don't know that they can have any other life. That is why they, in a way, cannot choose to be in porno. Additionally, once you're in and a success, the pressure and threats toward already-broken actresses essentially force them to stay in the industry. Whenever I make any sort of emotional appeal, I'm looking for your heart but failing to find it every time. This is why I can't argue with you - it's too depressing to see where humanity is heading! Why did I abandon the religion debate? Because it takes a very large book to prove that sort of thing, and this is not the place to write a book. Also, threads being deleted tend to cut me off mid-debate on here (why's this one still going?).</p>
<p>And I asked the last question of Coffeebreak, not you.</p>