<p>Hey guys, </p>
<p>for those of us who took the test, how'd you find it? I thought Bio was alright (about the same as I'd expected), but Chem was a bit harder. G'luck to all who still have to take either!</p>
<p>I agree, Chem was a lot harder than I expected. I didn't take Bio, although I probably should have.</p>
<p>Bio was just as expected, agreed. We'll see.</p>
<p>Whats the curve you think? Sparknotes curve is pretty accurate i assume?</p>
<p>I would imagine that the Collegeboard's curve is a bit more accurate.</p>
<p>hello. our other sat ii chem thread was deleted</p>
<p>Where can I see that at?</p>
<p>I thought Chemistry was unusually easy compared to sparknotes and 22 reals.</p>
<p>i'm suprised. everything i studied happened to have not been on the test...</p>
<p>^ I was hoping for electrochemistry, practically praying for it.
And what do they give me? A bunch of calculations.</p>
<p>chemistry was really hard in my opinon. biology- very easy</p>
<p>
[quote]
Whats the curve you think? Sparknotes curve is pretty accurate i assume?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I can tell you from experience that the SparkNotes biology curve is extremely inaccurate. Depending on the individual test, a SparkNotes 760 can be a College Board 800.</p>