<p>I’ve seen kids with IQ150-160 get SAT scores of about 2100 without studying</p>
<p>Kids with like 140-150 get like 1900 without studying</p>
<p>Etc.</p>
<p>Etc.</p>
<p>I’ve seen kids with IQ150-160 get SAT scores of about 2100 without studying</p>
<p>Kids with like 140-150 get like 1900 without studying</p>
<p>Etc.</p>
<p>Etc.</p>
<p>Mensa’s IQ test is ridiculous. In some ways, it’s worse than one of those online tests because there’s only one type of question.</p>
<p>For what it’s worth-
IQ = 136
SAT = 2270</p>
<p>I scored much higher on the verbal than quantitative section of my IQ test, but the opposite held true for the SAT. Personally, in this case I think the IQ test was more accurate.</p>
<p>IQ tests are ridiculously stupid. They do not, in any way, measure an “intelligence quotient”</p>
<p>IQ: 160
SAT: 2340</p>
<p>^ I wasn’t aware that this thread was asking for scores without studying. I scored a 210 sophomore PSAT and a 2120 sophomore SAT, both without cracking a single book or consulting a tutor and basically taken cold. My IQ qualified me for Mensa (I have absolutely no idea what it is in numerical terms), so I guess there’s a positive correlation…? lol :P</p>
<p>I got a 230 PSAT, no prep, but I found it infinitely easier than the SAT. Hmmmmm.</p>
<p>IQ: 145-155
SAT: 2300 no studying</p>
<p>^Wooooow. Makes me want to crumble.</p>
<p>@ fledgling</p>
<p>Yeah I also took that Mensa test thing when I was in 3rd grade (around 7-8 years old) and I qualified also but I dont remember what % I got.</p>
<p>IQ: 99.7 percentile which is… ~145?
Soph PSAT: 222 (some studying) M+CR:142
Soph SAT: 2340 (more studying) M+CR:1540
My biggest problem on the PSAT, and my only problem on the SAT, was stupid mistakes on math… I would think that stupid mistakes could hurt the correlation a bit.
Also, I think you should take studying into account. I feel like studying was a lot easier for me than it was for other people - I was able to improve faster and with less effort.</p>
<p>IQ: Took a recent IQ test with a psychologist…scored a 134</p>
<p>SAT: 2010 Sophomore year and 2330 Junior</p>
<p>From the IQ tests we had to take as part of an assignment in AP Psychology, my IQ is in the 135-145 range. I got a 202 sophomore PSAT without studying and a 232 junior PSAT with a good amount of preparation.</p>
<p>IQ:129 which is about the 97.5 percentile (i am 17 years old with a mental age of 22, so 22/17= 1.29*100=129 according to a 3 hr test done by a certified psychologist) the test was both verbal and nonverbal)
SAT: 2070
ACT: 31</p>
<p>For people who have not taken psych yet-remember people a valid IQ test has to be both verbal and nonverbal. All those tests on the internet and paper and pencil test without a verbal portion are not valid.</p>
<p>How do you guys even go about taking these"IQ" tests? Do you track down psychologists or what?</p>
<p>also curious?</p>
<p>^ & ^^ Yeah, you get a licensed psychologist to do it. I don’t really remember how my mom found the one I took my IQ test with because I was about 7 or 8. All I remember is that she had a dog named Wrinkles or something.</p>
<p>few people realize how imperative Wrinkles is to the test.</p>
<p>I was tested when I was around 13, so it might have gone up, but back then it was 138, and my SAT is 2170.</p>
<p>This thread disgusts and also intimidates me:</p>
<p>-An IQ of 160 is very unlikely. If it is true, then I am impressed.
-SAT score and IQ go somewhat well together, but there is no direct correlation.
-How the heck do you guys get 2100+ without studying?</p>
<p>My IQ: 135-140ish
SAT score: About 2000. Probably will be about 2100 in March…and that’s with ample studying.</p>
<p>based on this small trend on CC, I can extrapolate my IQ to be around 90.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I doubt that.</p>