What i really want to know is, will Ivys and Ivy calibur institutions who claim they want diversity really give poor kids an advantage.
Lets face it, all ivy schools have Recruiting officals on their Board of Admissions. Atheltic Recruitment, Minority Recruitment, International… But none for poor people. Who on the admissions staff advocates for the poor. And will it really be a tip factor like URM status and Athletic Recruitment is.
Plus if they are need blind that means they dont look at incomes. But that contradictorily and adversly affects their ability to seek the poor students. How will they know a kid is poor unless the kid talks about it. Even if you check to see if they are first in family to go to college or have a college fee waiver you are still guessing.
Also i am for Affirmative Action, but look at the population. The 2005 Census Preliminary numbers show that America is 14% black, 15.6% Hispanic, 4.26% Asian, 6.5% other, and the rest white. But we have Affirmative Action so the colleges can reflect that.
BUT GET THIS, AMERICA IS 13.9% BELOW THE POVERTY LINE. And in total is 19% “Poor”. But NO college right now has stated they Practice True Socioeconomic Affirmative Action.
In fact Harvard probably has less than 2% from below the poverty line, so shouldnt they start some sort of affirmative action so they can at least try to equalize there pop proportion to that of the national pop proportion. It will help them reach out to minorities also, but wont disenfranchise the white and asian populace, since 31% of poor are black, 30% Hispanic, and 33% white, with the rest classified other.
AND IN THE END NO ONE SHOULD BE AGAINST SOCIOECONOMIC AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SINCE IT IS TRULY ONE OF THE MOST CLASSIC FORMS OF SOCIAL REHABILITATION (GIVING TO THE POOR).
Then the next question is, Who is Poor.
For most State U’s, a Family Income of 40,000 a year is a little below average but not so far out. For Harvard, its something, so they offer no family contribution for that. So for schools that are just out of the Ivy League, like Northwestern, Caltech, JHU, G-Town, Caltech, Stanford… what would they consider poor. Also how would they screen for situations where a family income of 60,000 has to provide for a family of 9 or 10 or something.