<p>how accurately do the passages and questions in princeton review's SAT I book mirror the actual SAT I?</p>
<p>Im referring to both the 11 SATs book and the regular SAT book by princeton review</p>
<p>thanks</p>
<p>good question</p>
<p>thats not an answer...</p>
<p>harder, by a little bit. math is easier.</p>
<p>aiight thanks</p>
<p>"harder, by a little bit. math is easier."</p>
<p>I agree.</p>
<p>I took a Princton Review prep course for the March test. The most important thing for me was getting used to the legth and structure of the test as well as the way fo thinking required for the SATs, rather than the actual difficultly of the tests. It was kind of cool that I had like the head Princton Review guy teaching my verbal. He'd authored most of the PR prep books.</p>
<p>so u should expect that ur scores on the actual are higher than the princeton review scores at least in terms of raw score (since the table in pr is way inflated)?</p>
<p>DmctNY8,</p>
<p>Would that be John Katzman, or Adam Robinson?</p>
<p>So how did you do on the March SAT?</p>
<p>Graham Sultan, 2060 SAT from a 189 PSAT or a 1870 on the first practice test (once they adjusted the scores).</p>