<p>Are the Princeton Review Practice tests a valid representation of what i would get on the sat? </p>
<p>I think theyre math is relativly on target, maybe a little easier</p>
<p>I think theyre writing is MUCH harder than collegeboard tests</p>
<p>But im not so sure about critital reading... I just took a practice test and got 680; but im wondering how accurate Princeton Review critical reading tests are; what's the consensus ?? Much easier, much harder, just about right????</p>
<p>-thanks to anyone who answers</p>
<p>most people will say that princeton review tests are harder all around, including math.</p>
<p>I studied for the March sat primarily with PR practice tests and found the SAT to be much easier. So yeah, overall harder.</p>
<p>I think in general, PR is harder. Math and CR seem to be of slightly higher difficulty, while Writing is usually equivalent. I had been doing PR’s 11 practice tests for a while, and afterwords, the first BB practice test I did, I shot up over 100 points. More so than Kaplan, PR is definately a good option for practice tests before you use up the Blue Book.</p>