Princeton review Physics B - WOW

<p>Has anyone else noticed a TON of errors in this book e.g. saying 2 kg when the answer only works for .2kg or mislabeling the units on a PV graph, or even saying charge when it means change?</p>

<p>This book is unacceptable in the amount of errors it has</p>

<p>Should of gone with Barrons.</p>

<p>My main beef with the Physics B PR is that the notation and teaching method they use is incomprehensibly different from what I’ve been learning in class all year - which isn’t their fault, I know, but still.</p>

<p>I’ve noticed a ton of typos in the AP Euro book, though. Really bad ones, too, like “exis333333tence” and “revo 0[infinity symbol]lution”</p>

<p>in a potential difference problem they ask who far through the “whole” it will go. Wow.</p>

<p>well i really like the book and what it covers and teaches. But the biggest problem I found is it made TWO mistakes on their practice exam. TWO!</p>

<p>They said: W=change in v times d. when it is change in voltage times q. The second question is based upon this error. tsk tsk.</p>