Private Uni or LAC?

<p>I'm well aware of the differences posted on CC (LAC - small, seeing same faces, small classes, no grad students, personalized, focused on teaching undergrads rather than research, little/no TA's, intimate, tend to be in isolated areas to promote community, vast majority of students live on-campus, "life-of-the-mind" oriented, etc). </p>

<p>I recently got accepted as a transfer into both a prestigious uni. and a few LACs so far. I'll be happier in either of them than my current uni, but I just don't know which type suits me. I can't visit because I can't afford to and schools don't have an Accepted Students weekend for transfers. I've never visited and I only have a few weeks to reply, so everything I know about the schools comes from CC and hearsay. I still have decisions on the way (until June...ugh.), but I'd like to know what to expect for future reference.</p>

<p>I have the academics & my programs of interest covered, and each school I got into so far costs about the same.</p>

<p>Here's what I want:</p>

<ol>
<li><p>Less bureaucracy. I feel like my current school values paperwork and technicalities more than actual human interaction. I know it's to expedite the process since there are more than 20K students, but it just feels so impersonal. One thing I noticed when contacting schools about FA is that when I needed to submit additional documents, the LACs readily accepted them via email while the private universities wanted me to fill out forms and then submit them (sometimes via mail instead). Trifling as it seems, the way the LACs just accepted them without question or redirecting me to even more forms sorta shows how caring they are.</p></li>
<li><p>Smaller size & more intimate/personal. Both the LACs and the private uni. are MUCH smaller than my current school, so it's pretty much a win-win on this aspect. I just can't draw the line between "cozy" and "stifling" simply because I haven't visited or have gotten a feel of it yet. I can say, however, that my HS only had about 800 students overall (220 for my graduating class). I saw the same faces almost every day, and I loved it that feeling. The class sizes also matter. Granted, I'm pre-med and I should expect large Gen. Chem/O.Chem/Biology classes, but I feel as though even those types of classes in LACs would be fairly small (looking for validation here). My intended major once I transfer is not very popular, so I should have small classes in that department wherever I go (I guess it'll be a difference between double-digit and single-digit enrollment in those classes?). </p></li>
<li><p>Vibrant residential and campus life. Coming from a commuter school, the weekends leave something to be desired. Ideally, I'd like it if residential and campus life were part of the same dynamic. My dorm life is great, and it feels like a community, but I feel as though it's a totally separate world from the school. Maybe it's supposed to be that way, but I'd like it if the two lives would intermingle a bit. Would an LAC or uni likely have more things to do during the weekend on campus? </p></li>
<li><p>Sports & School spirit/interest. It's funny; as a senior in high school, I never liked the idea of going to a school with "spirit" because I thought it didn't match my personality. As a college freshman in a commuter school, however, I'm beginning to see the opposite. My school has no football team, and the school spirit is nonexistent. While it lends itself into a nice and quiet setting, it feels like something's missing. I'm not a sports fan, but for some odd reason I can't help but notice an uncomfortable silence. My friends from ND and UT always rave about tailgates and screaming fans, and I can't help but wonder what I'm missing. I do wonder if the thrill of tailgates and such will simply die out within a few months.</p></li>
<li><p>A bit less quirky. I can dig students who are passionate about what they study, and I like intellectual discussion at times. But in my current school, the prevailing culture is the gaming type. Students are proud of their love of Star Wars, World of Warcraft, anime, and K-pop. I'm not. Maybe this is just one type of "quirky," but I don't like this type, and I really hope this isn't the only type. When I try to talk to some fellow classmates, they're sometimes clueless about pop culture references and only recognize Star Wars/Trek references. I just find it a bit more difficult to hold a conversation with them. And these types of students are in almost every one of my classes, so it's not simply confined into a niche. It's just because of this I'm a bit more wary of going into a quirky/niche school. But my mind still remains open to experience. </p></li>
</ol>

<p>Sorry for the long post, but I didn't really have the luxury of considering these factors as an incoming freshman. Now that I do, I need guidance. Thanks!</p>

<p>I could probably name several private universities and LACs that vary wildly in bureaucracy, intimacy, vibrancy, school spirit, and quirkiness. Maybe you’re hoping to avoid playing the rankings game by not naming schools, but in this case, the devil is in the detail.</p>

<p>Which private university, liberal arts colleges, and current school are we talking about? </p>

<p>In general, LACs have less bureaucracy, smaller size, and more intimacy. In general, larger private universities have more campus vibrancy, a more robust sports scene, and less quirkiness. School spirit is highly particular. </p>

<p>So both types of school “suit” you. </p>

<p>I agree that you need to name names. For example, my kid goes to a LAC with no football team but with a lot of school spirit; things like this vary tremendously by specific school.</p>

<p>I agree, that these things vary from school to school. I also think that you are the only one who can/should determine which environment would work best for you. And two very reasonable people could prefer two different options. In my case, my S thought that LACs were too just small and loved his experience at a mid-sized university, but my D fell in love with LACs and is having an absoutely wonderful experience at one. </p>

<p>Vanderbilt and Colorado College. Like I said, though, many more decisions are still pending.</p>

<p>@happy1 I know I’m ultimately the best judge, but I have nothing to judge since I haven’t visited and I won’t be able to.</p>

<p>If you want to know class sizes, try looking at the on-line class schedules for each school.</p>

<ol>
<li>Colorado College. </li>
<li>Colorado College. </li>
<li>Tie.</li>
<li>Vanderbilt. </li>
<li>Vanderbilt. </li>
</ol>

<p>:D </p>

<p>I would expect Vanderbilt to be plenty personal. A much bigger difference is whether you like the “one class at a time” approach at Colorado college, where you take one class at time over short intense periods. </p>

<p>To me that’s like breaking up your 21 weekly meals into 3 breakfasts on Sunday 3 breakfasts on Monday, breakfast on Tuesday followed by 2 lunches, 3 lunches on Wednesday, 2 lunches on Thursday followed by a dinner. Friday and Saturday 3 dinners apiece. </p>

<p>You’re supposed to start at an LAC to get the smaller intro classes, then switch to a university so you have greater course selection in your major and particular areas of interest in the upperclass years.
If you switch now to an LAC you’ll have experienced the worst of each venue.</p>