<p>While taking the diagnostic test on the Princeton's Review for the SSAT/ISEE, I came upon this problem on the Qualitative Camparisons:</p>
<p>Group A Group B</p>
<p>√49 + √16 √65</p>
<p>(A) Group A > Group B
(B) Group B > Group A
(C) Group A = Group B
(D) You can't tell.</p>
<p>From the first glance, √49 + √16 appears to be 7 + 4 which is 11 which is way over √65 which is approximately 8. But being rather paranoid on tests, I tend to over-think problems and I noticed that the √n could be negative too. So if that was true, then 8 could be over -11, which mean the correct answer would be D.</p>
<p>However, when I looked at the answers, the book said the correct answer was A. This might be an error, but when I was looking at the study guide for Upper ISEE that ISEE posts on their website, I noticed a similar problem that also assumed that the √n is positive.</p>
<p>So my question is, is this simply a coincidental error that wouldn't happen on the real test, or should I go ahead and assume that √n is positive for the ISEE?</p>