Psat 2012 Wednesday Discussion

<p>hey what about the writing about how astronomers can acquire the distances of stars, which would seem impossible</p>

<p>is it distances among the stars or distances between the stars?</p>

<p>And I put consumed by the fog, it makes more sense because maccu piccu was in the mountains and so it was ‘surrounded’ by fog. Surrounded is a synonym for consumed</p>

<p>the ans was 3/2<p<5/3, right?</p>

<p>@Smarty1201 yeah I got 16</p>

<p>^ yess!!! I put 1.6 though…would that still be correct??? Anybody knows?</p>

<p>what was the purpose of the maccu piccu passage, it was either to present a personal thoery or the describe a location.</p>

<p>yeah I put 1.6 too</p>

<p>^ I thought the purpose was to explain it’s unique and fascination place? Idk I chose an answer closest to that</p>

<p>Wow. I think I put 1.6 at first then changed it to 1.7. .-.
Can’t remember why.</p>

<p>yea i think that 's similar to describe a mysterious location which is what i had in mind but then why wouldn’t it be personal theory?</p>

<p>it was 8 not 16</p>

<p>^ how was it 8?..</p>

<p>X+Y was 4
So it was 2^4… 16!!! Please someone say I’m right because I already missed like 5 on the math part</p>

<p>what is this p question?</p>

<p>finding the area of a sideways triangle</p>

<p>it was definitely 16. also, is it religious or sensory?</p>

<p>did people put childish language or aesthetic value of the word?</p>

<p>Thread re-opened since PSATs completed now. (I don’t care if Wednesday and Saturday tests were different - it’s a policy to not allow discussion until all exams are completed.)</p>

<p>The new thread can be found at this link:</p>

<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/1405253-wednesday-2012-psat-general-discussion-15.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/1405253-wednesday-2012-psat-general-discussion-15.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;