<p>Naviance is a very helpful tool. The charts are really fascinating E.g., Stanford seems to hate our school, but you can see on Naviance that the one person they admit annually has a fairly low GPA/SAT relative to all they reject. Always an athlete. I am not complaining, as I think athletes tend to work very hard (our S had higher grades when he was a varsity athlete!), and test scores are, IMHO, not the best indicator of success (our kid has very high test scores and GPA that is lower than you'd expect, just in case you are wondering). It's just interesting. But don't take it as gospel. And understand that Naviance is completely stats based--you have no idea about leadership, etc. Our son applied to a couple schools where he was in the stratosphere for Naviance but he was applying for vocal performance, so that's an entirely different kettle of fish. No word yet on acceptances, so I shouldn't be posting, really!</p>
<p>Our school also shares its own stats for the last five years, online--lowest GPA applied, lowest admitted, average applied, average admitted, etc. Very very helpful (doesn't stop a kid from magical thinking, where he thinks could possibly be the lowest GPA admitted in next year's stats...). And we also have access to a book that shows GPA and SAT of every student admitted to every school--no names but of course you can tell who some of them are. You can see how many times kids took the SAT. Ask to see that book, if you have one. We have a huge (2500-plus) school, though, and 15 guidance counselors.</p>
<p>Ask about Rugg's majors book. Or check your local library. Son's GC printed out the list of Music Major schools with levels of selectivity. Say your kid is interested in linguistics--ask for that list, too. Of course, it has its quirks: it lists Curtis in the 3rd tier of selectivity when it's the most selective music school, but there may be academic criteria involved. In any case, it is useful, especially if your kid likes two subjects and you can cross reference.</p>
<p>In the end, we--son and parents--did all the research, and the GC did the paperwork, and of course the GC letter.</p>
<p>But here's what I wish we had done differently: S wants to go into music--singing and choral directing. He wanted to drop Spanish and take Italian or German and the GC pointed out that he would be in AP Spanish and that would be good--four years of Spanish and an AP. So far, not so good--he hates it. He is sorry he didn't take Italian, as he's going to sing in Italy this summer! (Younger S put his foot down and said he wanted to take French for two years, who cares if he doesn't have 3-4 years of Spanish?) Don't worry so much about what you THINK the colleges want. Gently allow your kid to do what he really wants to do, as long as he understands what his ideal colleges expect. E.G., Vassar recommends 4 years of science but does not require it.</p>
<p>Overall, I suggest respecting the GC. Ours has been doing this for 20-plus years and while I had heard some stories about how she steered some kid the wrong way, I chose to believe she would be fine, and she's been great. She truly wants her kids to get into the best school for them.</p>