I know that Rustic programs get a bad rep. A lot of people on CC seem bitter about them, asserting that they are only for rich kids, and could actually end up hurting your admissions chances. I understand that many of these programs are more fun in the sun than service, and those ones can be viewed as such. Although I am strongly opposed to the mentality some people have about Rustic Pathways trips (I believe that even some service is more valuable than sitting around at home all summer), I understand that some programs /are/ more intensive than others.
I am going on Rustic Pathways’ “Come With Nothing, Go Home Rich” program in Thailand. With this program, I will be away from home for 4 weeks, and traveling between local, rural villages. I will not be staying in any of the nice Base Houses, and will be sleeping on mats on the floors of local huts. I will not be allowed to bring anything from home (we buy all of our clothes for the month with $50 in a Thai bazaar). I will be doing intense community service, such as building schools, bathrooms, and community centers, throughout the entire trip. I am very excited to challenge myself in this unfamiliar and physically demanding environment.
Do you think that even this program, which is not a cushy vacation trip, will be looked down upon by admissions directors? I don’t plan to write the “mission trip essay”, but I think that this program fits in well with other programs and interests displayed in my application. Do you think this program will look bad?