<p>@Shaydizzle1 I hate to break it to you, but there’s a flaw in your argument. According to Wikipedia (I don’t know if that’s used often here), “Repetition is the simple repeating of a word, within a sentence or a poetical line, with no particular placement of the words, in order to emphasize.” You actually CAN say that the section specified had repetition because the author used several words and phrases repeatedly.</p>
<p>Thank you wise jew… do you remember any other math questions?</p>
<p>@RedPassion I just did the math. XD</p>
<p>haha. i forgot the math. i would do it but i don’t remember anything. sorry on totally blanking on you guys. </p>
<p>it was repetition.</p>
<p>was the woman a nag, a bully, etc.</p>
<p>@Shaydizzle1 Additionally, who’s to say that the author was basing his claims off of “incomplete information”? He listed reasons that he believed to be good enough to prove his point, and he firmly believed in his statements, as did the author of passage 2.</p>
<p>she was a bully she attacked someone.</p>
<p>I think the question asked about characterizing the older grandmother when she stood in front of the cots to ensure that they could not be moved. Her abuse of of her size, along with some force and aggression, seems to lean the answer towards bullying.</p>
<p>What was the answer for the purpose of “leaving her own accommodations” for the CR passages? Was it familiar or the one about it being difficult? </p>
<p>[The</a> Writing on My Forehead - Nafisa Haji - Google Books](<a href=“The Writing on My Forehead: A Novel - Nafisa Haji - Google Books”>The Writing on My Forehead: A Novel - Nafisa Haji - Google Books)</p>
<p>The visits were “familiar occasions”</p>
<p>Ah, that was the question that asked about what you can tell based on Nanima leaving her own accommodations.</p>
<p>Hey guys!</p>
<p>i was wondering which section of math was the experimental. Was it the one with a sideways parabola shifted to the left, and it looked for the new x intercept?</p>
<p>it was the one with the girl wrapping a gift box. idk if that was the same one. and there was a like a chart where the x’s were 7.</p>
<p>Passage 1 and Passage 2</p>
<p>idealistic<br>
realistic
fund./simply
civics/and career of childrens
helping children with their interests
snide
higher education
anticipate/response
repetition</p>
<p>Mini</p>
<p>Dramatic
pivotal to world success</p>
<p>defining a quality
pivotal to the world</p>
<p>Mini
question/response
Sensory-
why he had use electric
different perspectives</p>
<p>Long Passage:</p>
<p>obedient bully commanding adamant cooking conflict resent criticism familiar experiences CLOse attention rising indignation</p>
<p>provide a context </p>
<p>Long P:</p>
<p>hard to believe
recent info
novices alike
planets clear
eflective informstive
comical anecdote
emphemeral
s
LONG P:</p>
<p>novelty
pompous and stuffy
evocative
atypical
correct
holds</p>
<p>Sentence ComP :
adequate pinpoint
shortcomings
easygoing
disconcert/furnish
peremptory/ordeal
eludes
assiduous
primacy
trifling
confounded inscrutable
neophyte
circumvent
flop</p>
<p>Anymore additions? Any sentence completons?</p>
<p>Also something about consensus? anyone get that?</p>
<p>are you sure these are all the right answers?</p>
<p>I got consensus/dislikely
“The consistent _____ made swif passage of the campaign change bill through congress____” ish</p>
<p>hm, that one was the grid in section…can the grid in’s ever be experimental? i only had 1 grid in section and 3 multiple choice sections</p>
<p>@RedPassion I remember the calender where the date of x was 7, but I don’t remember any questions about girls wrapping gift boxes. o.O </p>
<p>@alargeblackman14 I don’t remember the second one for paper being “pivotal to the world”. I think that the second one for the spice mini was something about how spices altered the course of history, or something like that. Was the answer to the telescope question really about how the telescope was a recent invention (that’s hard to believe)?</p>
<p>The inconsisten, or eluding, I mean. I forget really haha</p>
<p>yeah i got what you got on tkaler. </p>
<p>idk but it looked the least like the other sections.</p>