<p>“Your link underscores my point not yours. 12.5% of those with over a 2100 got rejected as well as 15% with over a 4.0 weighted. That seems very stats based to me. Remember that some kids with 2100+'s did not get good grades and those that got good grades could have gotten poor SAT’s. Remember that many of those rejected were OOS who applied too late. When you take that into consideration it seems that it would take something exceptional (in a bad way) for an academically qualified in state student to get rejected.”</p>
<p>Ypu’re making a lot of assumptions here that you can’t prove and that I just don’t agree with. But, I don’t have the data to prove it either. This seems the sticking point between us, so I will just leave it alone for now. I do highly doubt that ANY ONE applicant of the 1500+, 12.5% was an URM though.</p>