<p>I've taken two tests from the 7th edition Barron's SAT II Chem. book. I was wondering how strongly would the scores on those tests correlate to my scores on the real thing? I know Barron's tends to me much harder than the acutal test in many subjects, so I'm wondering if anyone knows if it's the same w/ the Chem. book. Thanks.</p>
<p>the barrons sat 2 is harder than the actual one. If you do reasonably well in barrons, then you should be fine on the actual test</p>
<p>I used the Barrons and Sparknotes... How does Sparknotes compare?</p>
<p>Ok, thanks. I scored in the 680-700 range and I'm hoping for at least a 700+, so I should have no problem achieving that on the actual thing?</p>
<p>And from what I hear sparknotes is usually pretty similar to the actual thing.</p>
<p>Okay. Thanks. It was the first time I used Sparknotes... and I used it for Physics and chem. Hopefully my choices were good...</p>
<p>sparknotes is a joke. i usually get barrons, overreact since i fail on the practice tests, and then feel really confident on the real test since it overly prepares u for the real thing.</p>
<p>How is Kaplan compared to the real thing? I'm not doing so hot on these tests...</p>
<p>....bump.... is kaplan good prep for sat2 chem???</p>
<p>everything im reading in kaplan is what we learned just recently in AP chemistry. if the SAT2 is this hard, then im really screwed. =</p>
<p>How is like 700-720 on the barrons on the real test? I didn't exactly time myself and like finished in 25 minutes. So I made a lot of mistakes so if I used all the time I think I could have gotten in the 760 range. I really want a 800 on the real one.</p>
<p>its really annoying how we can't use a calculator on these, its annoying waste of time multiplying and dividing fractions and decimals...i've gotten calculator dependant over the years...</p>