<p>no way in hell the answer to that question is asia. Otherwise it would not refer to the 1920s</p>
<p>The immigration laws regarded southern/eastern Europe. Asia had their own act - Chinese Exclusion Act. (which, I think, was twenty years before)</p>
<p>Damn… i put education for that. Who was the author, or who said it? For 88.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I think this is the same logic trap I fall into. If you remember Frederick Turner, who argued about needing a frontier as necessary, but it was also an escape valve, where the downtrodden can go when population increases. Otherwise, there is class warfare.</p>
<p>Remembering this justification for imperialism, I pick A, which is counteracting European influence.</p>
<p>If you think about imperialism itself, why do we need to counteract European influence? Imperialism is simply about the mother country itself. As long as if you can get colonies, you don’t need to start wars over other colonies.</p>
<hr>
<p>Now 81. There’s 9 more? For the love of God…</p>
<ol>
<li>most English tobacco labor before 1680 was indentured servants</li>
<li>difference between Mass/VA and Spanish colonies: joint stock</li>
<li>local colonial affairs dealt with by: town meetings</li>
<li>Obligation to enforce court rulings: Eisenhower</li>
<li>led to depression: production v. consumption</li>
<li>1880s and 1890s party agreement: no immigration from china</li>
<li>ICC and sherman antitrust: first one is regulatory, second is prohibitory</li>
<li>lost generation: writers who go off to europe who were disillusioned by the 1920s</li>
<li>reason for the second new deal: deepening recession still present, had to fix it, to quell critics (critics said Roosevely wanted to destroy capitalism?)</li>
<li>lowell picture: availability of factory work for men and women</li>
<li>first to be settled by europeans: FL</li>
<li>quote about segregated schools being unequal: brown v board</li>
<li>14th point: self-determination</li>
<li>helped french in french and indian war: Iroquois</li>
<li>saratoga: french support</li>
<li>bad farming conditions in quote: 1890s</li>
<li>book not matched with setting: farewell to arms and reconstruction</li>
<li>open door: interest in commerce in china</li>
<li>judicial review: john marshall (don’t think this was one of the options. the only relevant option was madison. it didn’t have marbury or marshall as choices)</li>
<li>jefferson and hamilton: j was strict construction, h was loose construction</li>
<li>nixon, mccarthy, jfk: anticommunists</li>
<li>carters unpopularity: iran hostage crisis</li>
<li>what didnt lbj do in great society: social security</li>
<li>vietnam war in us: caused division in unity on homefront</li>
<li>native american population loss: european disease and lack of resistance</li>
<li>picture of dots in south: good land in southern area for plantation farming</li>
<li>Roosevelt Corollary - intervene in Latin America</li>
<li>Dred Scott case - he is not a citizen and cannot speak for himself in court</li>
<li>JFK Soviet missiles in Cuba - naval embargo of Cuba</li>
<li>Walt Whitman poem questions - Rejecting Reason</li>
<li>What movement does the poem come from. – Romanticism</li>
<li>1920s immigration stopped flow of- southern/eastern Europeans</li>
<li>first to have regular maritime voyages- Spain (? vs. Portugal!)</li>
<li>Era of Good Feelings was hindered by- issue of slavery in new territories</li>
<li>Missouri Compromise - led to Missouri as a slave state</li>
<li>Clay and Warhawks supported War of 1812 - To drive out British/Indians in the West</li>
<li>who did not support FDR in the 1936 election – Industrialist</li>
<li>manifest destiny- spread to the Pacific Ocean</li>
<li>desegregation of military- Truman in Korea</li>
<li>Agibail Adams and John Adams letters - Women were interested in being politically equal</li>
<li>Indian Removal of the 1830s- Trail of Tears</li>
<li>19th Amendment- women can vote</li>
<li>Nixon policy of d</li>
</ol>
<p>i’ll be sure to remember all these facts when i take the AP exam next week. haha this is so useful and productive</p>
<p>For the imperialism question, why is it not that the americans were LEAST interested in colonizing the territories? they had no need to do so, and they didn’t want to put their people there. They would definitely want to counteract the Europeans to prove their supremacy. they were not interested in settling; they were interested in exploitation.</p>
<p>Also, what was the assemblies question in the colonies specifically?</p>
<p>wait, isn’t isolationalism non-intervention politically or economically? wasn’t that an answer, cut off all relations?</p>
<p>also, i think it was women and education
since catharine beecher was a women education advocate</p>
<p>It’s about morals. “characters of a man,” “heart,” etc. All that crap.</p>
<p>for the imperialism question, none of you think its because america was getting too overpopulated?</p>
<p>was the overpopulation choice about colonizing the new territories? if so, I think that might be right</p>
<p>RedCatharsis, did you include the one about the Act of Religious Tolerance of Maryland?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Not at all. The United States, still to today, is underpopulated. China and us are roughly the same size and they have over 1,030,000,000 more people than us.</p>
<p>it was for imperialism and was a least likely choice. i dont think it would make sense for america’s motive for imperialism would be overpopulation</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Like I said in another post, it’s in Turner’s Thesis for Imperialists, there ought to be a nice little place for the downtrodden in the population to go when things get too crowded. It’s not necessarily politically relevant but a point of his thesis is simply that we might want to start conquering some lands so that we HAVE a place for them to go later.</p>
<p>Also, wouldn’t a policy of isolationism counteract your claim? We want to stay away from Europeans, unless it’s US business. An exception to isolationism, of course, is when we decide to possess foreign lands… (Hawaii? etc)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Actually that option on the test said it was isolation EXCEPT for militarily and economically, which is not good, haha.</p>
<p>There is another option that’s simply avoiding European affairs due to the geographic distance between the US and them.</p>
<p>The last passage is moral teachers and the Cult of Domesticity.</p>
<p>If you read the passage carefully, it actually talks about how the women need to educate males and children morally. Not about “knowledge” or “wisdom,” per se, but moral education. That’s a sharp difference. (Republican motherhood?)</p>
<p>i put overpopulation but i think thats wrong because thats a main reason for imperalism</p>
<p>theses 3 questions…i do not know if they were answered?</p>
<ol>
<li> It gave a really long quote about freeing the people there or something and it said it pertains to what region?</li>
</ol>
<p>i put Phillipines. I dont remember the other choices</p>
<ol>
<li><p>In the 1920s, what did NOT occur or something?
the choices were like advertisement, machine production, cars…</p></li>
<li><p>I do not think Act of Regliosu Tolerance of Maryland was an answer…i just remember it being a choice…</p></li>
</ol>
<p>wait, wasn’t the imperialism question a LEAST question? therefore, the overpopulation choice would be correct. that was the “least” motive for imperialism</p>
<p>oh crap…wow i missed hte one about maryland because i thought it had something to do with puritans…what about my other two questions? I do not think they are in the list.</p>
<p>also can anyone confirm what did not happen 3 years after the depression? inflation or investments in capital goods.</p>
<p>The Tolerance thing was a question, I think. And it asked basically what it did for Maryland</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p></li>
</ol>
<p>I have no clue what #1 is. Uh-oh. Lol</p>
<h1>2 I put like an automobile empire then proliferation into the suburbs? I’m not sure on it, but from what I recall, a shift towards the suburbs happens after WWII with the GI bill and not before it. I’m not certain though.</h1>
<h1>3. See above!</h1>
<p>yes bee thats wat i thought but lots of other people are saying it was to counteract european dominance which i thought was true in regards to africa</p>