<p>Depends on your definition of imperialism. I find that to accommodate US population is an argument that imperialists had, not necessarily that it was a reality.</p>
<p>I don’t understand how we were concerned with counteracting European forces, rather than just ensuring US interests. It seems the latter makes more sense–we don’t care if other nations have colonies, etc, but we do care if we don’t have our own. For reasons B-E.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>It is before depression.
It cannot be Portugal, because many are right, when they mention that nations like China and people like the Vikings did regular maritime voyages before the Portuguese, but they were not options.
As such, we much look to systematic–never, ever, does Spain SYSTEMATICALLY explore ANYWHERE.</p>
<p>Spain does. She sends 7 explorers to target the Americas.</p>
<p>Desegregation of army IS Truman in Korea. That is the only Civil Rights-like thing he does.</p>
<p>And the 1812 War Hawks wanted to push Britain out of the west and stop the Indians.</p>
<p>Lowell Mills - Men WERE employed. What were the choices for morality, though?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p></li>
<li><p>It was a quote then the options were “Populist,” “Federalist,” etc.</p></li>
<li><p>No I think that answer choice was B. If not, C.</p></li>
<li><p>Other options included governors, religious leaders.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>
</p>
<p>You give me hope</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I think it asked for what was false, however.</p>
<p>“Many nations in Europe…were involved in gaining possessions and influence in weaker countries…Some in the United States believed that the nation had to compete with the imperialistic nations for new territory or it would grow weak and fail to survive.”</p>
<p>And. Some believed that there needed to be a leaking valve for the downtrodden in the population as places became more crowded, otherwise there would be class warfare.</p>
<p>For the imperial question of which was the least used motive of imperialization i put down the fact that america had to expand since it was overpopulated. America did feel the need expand but it was not because they were overpopulated and were forced to move their people. the other answer chances were all reasonable…</p>
<ol>
<li>most English tobacco labor before 1680 was indentured servants</li>
<li>difference between Mass/VA and Spanish colonies: joint stock</li>
<li>local colonial affairs dealt with by: town meetings</li>
<li>Obligation to enforce court rulings: Eisenhower</li>
<li>led to depression: production v. consumption</li>
<li>1880s and 1890s party agreement: no immigration from china</li>
<li>ICC and sherman antitrust: first one is regulatory, second is prohibitory</li>
<li>lost generation: writers who go off to europe who were disillusioned by the 1920s</li>
<li>reason for the second new deal: deepening recession still present, had to fix it, to quell critics (critics said Roosevely wanted to destroy capitalism?)</li>
<li>lowell picture: availability of factory work for men and women</li>
<li>first to be settled by europeans: FL</li>
<li>quote about segregated schools being unequal: brown v board</li>
<li>14th point: self-determination</li>
<li>helped french in french and indian war: Iroquois</li>
<li>saratoga: french support</li>
<li>bad farming conditions in quote: 1890s</li>
<li>book not matched with setting: farewell to arms and reconstruction</li>
<li>open door: interest in commerce in china</li>
<li>judicial review: john marshall (don’t think this was one of the options. the only relevant option was madison. it didn’t have marbury or marshall as choices)</li>
<li>jefferson and hamilton: j was strict construction, h was loose construction</li>
<li>nixon, mccarthy, jfk: anticommunists</li>
<li>carters unpopularity: iran hostage crisis</li>
<li>what didnt lbj do in great society: social security</li>
<li>vietnam war in us: caused division in unity on homefront</li>
<li>native american population loss: european disease and lack of resistance</li>
<li>picture of dots in south: good land in southern area for plantation farming</li>
<li>Roosevelt Corollary - intervene in Latin America</li>
<li>Dred Scott case - he is not a citizen and cannot speak for himself in court</li>
<li>JFK Soviet missiles in Cuba - naval embargo of Cuba</li>
<li>Walt Whitman poem questions - Rejecting Reason</li>
<li>What movement does the poem come from. – Romanticism</li>
<li>1920s immigration stopped flow of- southern/eastern Europeans</li>
<li>first to have regular maritime voyages- Spain (? vs. Portugal!)</li>
<li>Era of Good Feelings was hindered by- issue of slavery in new territories</li>
<li>Missouri Compromise - led to Missouri as a slave state</li>
<li>Clay and Warhawks supported War of 1812 - To drive out British/Indians in the West</li>
<li>who did not support FDR in the 1936 election – Industrialist</li>
<li>manifest destiny- spread to the Pacific Ocean</li>
<li>desegregation of military- Truman in Korea</li>
<li>Agibail Adams and John Adams letters - Women were interested in being politically equal</li>
<li>Indian Removal of the 1830s- Trail of Tears</li>
<li>19th Amendment- women can vote</li>
<li>Nixon policy of d</li>
</ol>
<p>for the colonial assemblies question, why is it not true that in the 17th century all assembly members had to be white, male, property owners? i think that was a choice.</p>
<p>red: for number 71, im nearly 100% positive that the answer is the gulf of tonkin resolutions. Just gotta read american pageant which has a whole section on that part. If you need more clarification ill get back to you later.</p>
<p>also, do you guys remember that question that asked what did NOT happen during world War II? one choice had to do with migration from south to the north and the west, and thats all I remember really. something else about integration? and for #9, the part that you have in parentheses was another choice, right?</p>
<p>I am no longer going to argue about the JFK, Nixon, McCarthy question, all I am going to say is that the question was asking about how they started their careers. </p>
<p>Regarding the Massachusetts Bay Colony and Jamestown question, it was either joint-stock venture or lack of military _____ (i forgot what, perhaps leadership?). I am assuming it is joint-stock venture, even though it is badly phrased since a charter to stock company, which both of colonies were, isn’t equivalent to joint-stock ventures. However, you could easily discount the military option due to the presence of Captain John Smith, Captain Edward Wingfield, etc. Although, it depends upon the wording of the answer since Jamestown lacked out-and-out soldiers as 50% were gentlemen searching for precious metals. </p>
<p>Does anyone remember the time period for the question about the colonial legislatures? That is essential to determine the correct answer.</p>
<p>I don’t think that was a choice. It was supposed to be showing the relationship between the assembly and Britain, OR, you are supposed to show what sort of assembly they had (town meetings).</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>The point is that Spain never had joint-stock anything, whereas Britain did</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Elaborate a bit more? I totally do not recollect that</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I do need more clarification. Remember, the problem in the comparison is that they’re both mandates. I don’t say one isn’t, I’m saying that they BOTH are. Though, of course, like I point out, there are problems with both.</p>