<p>^I can say that about writing and maths, but not about CR. Especially not for that Princes passage. 
That is why I asked about the curve/ 700 threshold. What do you think it will be? The 700 mark for CR?</p>
<p>Ughhhhhhh the CR was killer. Really didnāt like the smell one either. </p>
<p>can anyone find the curve for it, then?</p>
<p>What is the math curve like? Is it generous?</p>
<p>@Shystarryskies - How did you find the math? I completely messed up my grid-ins, so Iām a bit angry. I misunderstood the question with underlining and one other oneā¦ I knew what my mistake was literally the minute my paper was collected, though </p>
<p>@WooTheDay I messed up math. I know I made a mistake on one grid in, and about 3 other questions. Ugh It sucks because everything else went off beautifully for me.</p>
<p>@Shystarryskies Iām in the same boat as you. I was MOST prepared for math but did the worst on it today. The other sections went better than expected, but Iām so disappointed in what could have been RE: Mathā¦ </p>
<p>@WooTheDay Exactly! I hope itās a super generous curve, bc lots of people I know found math tricky.</p>
<p>@Shystarryskiesā I just read a depressing thread that even missing one question usually yields 780ā¦ in the past two years, missing one has meant 760 (I heard it was that for the OCT SAT this year)ā¦ </p>
<p>@Marazanā I was following that thread up until page 24 when I realized there was also a results thread for that SAT (in terms of their actual scores). I looked and a lot of the people who were posting and seemed reallys ure of themselves didnāt do so wellā¦</p>
<p>@Hasmat OMGļ¼ļ¼ Native test takers think CR easy? the curve doesnāt make sense!! So if I made 7 errors, can I still get 700?</p>
<p>Was the Prince passage really that bad? It was long and tedious, but straigtforward. The only question that really puzzled me was the one asking which document would have helped prove the authorās theory. I chose the document detailing how much Elijah paid, but I think it could have been the Princesā deed to the land. I didnāt see many comments discussing that question in the March 2014 thread.</p>
<p>And sorry, I have no idea what the curve will be like. Your best bet would be to dig through the March thread you revived.</p>
<p>The grid in one was 7/19. I donāt remember the letters for the leap year one, but it should have been the 3 left most letters if my memory of the diagram is correct (Basically everything in the multiples of 4 circle except the part which contained numbers that were also multiples of 25 but not 16).</p>
<p>Btw the test was the same as the US march 2014 one, so look at the discussion thread for that test if you want to check your answers.</p>
<p>yes 7/19 was my answer . do you remember the one with the cricles attached to the triangles and the sum of the triangles was 96 . the answer was 8 right ???</p>
<p>What was the curve? for math critical and writing</p>
<p>Yep, answer was indeed 8.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember a maths question about a sequence starting at zero, with each subsequent term being the sum of the previous and next term? I answered -3 and I want to check my answer but I donāt remember all the details. If asked for the 10th term, I think I got it wrong (answer should be 0 in that case). The thing is thereās no mention of it in the US March 2014 thread so Iām hoping it was an experimental section.</p>
<p>Not experimental, it was the same as the 5th I think</p>
<p>good do you remember the one about textbook art,science and history and two books were replaced ??? also was the answer for the last question on the last writing section A ? </p>
<p>Iām sure it wasnt experimental , and yeah the answers was 0
Also guys, did all of you had in te writing section the one with soviet union and the us ?
Oh and the text about prince, the word right in context meant claim ?</p>