<p>wasnt the having never seen question about theyre amazement with architecture and buildings in the last section?.. i got 3 no errors for the regular writing part in the middle of the test</p>
<p>Yes, the architecture was in the 14 questions section, but the more than/greater than for the rhino was in the 35.</p>
<p>“Having never seen” was not a choice, “Never having seen” was.</p>
<p>Can anyone who remembers the sunflower question better explain which answer was right?</p>
<p>YES i think i got 3 no errors as well…</p>
<p>Never having seen is correct.It is gramatically correct and whats more ,it sounds better.What would you say ''I have never seen that movie before ‘’ or ‘‘I never have seen that movie before’’</p>
<p>^ Actually in your example, I would choose “have never seen”, but for the question, Never having seen is correct.</p>
<p>The sunflower question was “The sunflowers stood, their heads drooping.”</p>
<p>JNE23: Because “their heads drooping” is a participial phrase. It could even be moved to the front of the sentence to make “Their heads drooping, the sunflowers stood” although that does not sound as nice. Hopefully this made more sense?</p>
<p>Can somebody compile a list of answers we have agreed on?</p>
<p>yes. true. “the sunflowers stood, their heads drooping”.</p>
<p>Meh, owell. I was answering the sunflower one as time was running out, guess I didn’t really think it through enough.</p>
<p>Whats a normal curve look like for writing?</p>
<p>-2 and 11: 800 good day. 750 bad day. 770 sounds right.</p>
<p>-5 and 10: 730 good day. 670 bad day. maybe 700.</p>
<p>-5 and 8 or 9: 710 or 720 very good day: 650 bad day. maybe 680 or 690</p>
<p>I thought the revising question read… “Mary never “turns” in her research papers until revising them”.</p>
<p>Hmm - I think so too.</p>
<p>You can correct me, but wasn’t it somewhere along the lines of “In order to make a name for herself, Mary never turned her papers in until revising them.”</p>
<p>I could be combining two different questions…who knows.</p>
<p>no. I dont think it was written like that. Even if it was: Mary never turns in her research papers until she revises them.</p>
<p>and for 1a1: In order to make a name for herself, Mary never turned her papers in until she revised them.</p>
<p>@1a1: yeah i think you’re combining two different ones haha. It was “In order to make a name for herself as a short story writer…” and “Mary never turns her papers to her editor until revising them”</p>
<p>What was the rest of that sentence with “In order to make a name for herself…”?</p>
<p>Peter Pan one i think</p>
<p>Peter Pan? Wasn’t that with Wendy? I know both sentences talk about names, but aren’t they different?</p>