<p>I really love Princeton, from its strong sciences to its beautiful campus to its respectable dance program (three things I consider important for my future alma mater), and it is definitely one of my, if not my only, top choice, but I have to admit, it is annoying that it is one of only two schools I can think of that make you take 3 SAT IIs. I already have Physics and Math 2 under my belt with 800s on both, but I need the third (because Math 1 doesn't count) and I'll be taking it in June, but I'm not sure about which to take. I'm deciding between Biology-M and US History. I took both as AP classes this year but consider myself stronger in biology for two reasons: (1) I'm generally better at science and (2) I had an atrocious APUSH teacher. So I was wondering, would it be better to score higher on biology or show breadth (aka I can do more than science) with US. I doubt my US score will be atrocious, but at what point difference should I say its better to take biology. Or should I take both? Also, does breadth matter as much for Princeton, especially if I'm certain I will study math/science? Also, would biology be looked at slightly differently since it is more "wordy" (I can't think of a better word) than the physical sciences (math, physics, chem)?</p>
<p>Thanks for any advice!</p>