SATII BIO : is PR practice test accurate?

<p>So, all along, I've been studying for Bio. I'm taking it this saturday, and when I take the
sparknotes tests +PR practice tests, I get 600s.
I need a score 700+, and if these sparknotes and PR tests are accurate..I'm doomed/
Are PR tests accurate? The practice tests covered so much stuff the actual book didn't even explain. This is the only book I have!!!
With one day left, what do you recommend I do? </p>

<p>1) Just take it; PR tests are inaccurate.
2) Take a diff. subject</p>

<p>Well here's the thing. I can either take Latin or Korean.
I'm really not that good at latin, so not really sure whether I can pull off a 700.
I am positive I can get an 800 in Korean..cuz I am Korean ..
But there's really no point in taking the korean subject test since I have korean citizenship..</p>

<p>Help me</p>

<p>Well I don’t have the princeton book but my Sparknotes score are 570 620 and 600.Scored 660 on the real thing and decided to take another science instead of biology :D</p>

<p>Anyone else want to list their sparknotes/any review book scores and actual bio scores so we can gauge how accurate they are?</p>

<p>Is the material on the sparknotests easier or harder than the actual thing?
Is the scoring easier/harder?</p>

<p>I got an 800 on PR, and 630 in the BB. i think PR is a lot easier. its really tailored to the material that it covers so it feels like an extra long ‘chapter review’. i was shocked at my 630…OTL|| ■■■</p>

<p>I found PR to be fairly accurate (especially for Biology E). However, my score on the actual test was a little higher (about 30-60 points).</p>