<p>o and what were the answer choices for the 3rd PTH question, i put the blood calcium levels woudl be triggered to increase but wehre there two answers like that, one for negative feedback and one for positive? </p>
<p>but im positive that the first of those questions wasnt asking wat happens to the calcium level</p>
<p>the 3rd onewas like what would happaen if someone ahd a low-calcium diet.
one of the choices was that the body can't cause the blood to have more calcium, i put that... come to think about it, i have no idea why i put that. :(</p>
<p>if someone argues about the tropical rain forest one to collegeboard and can get the question out would be great... i put deciduous forest. yeah.</p>
<p>Uh although this was probaly discussed in the 30 pages, i dont wanna look for it. So here is my question. Remember that one questionabout bog plants that are carnivorous? I was pretty sure it said what was lacking in their ENVIROMENT? It wouldn't be nitrogen would it? They can't get nitrogen, but it's there. Any thoughts?</p>
<p>yeahhh about that last pth question.. ookanuba put something about negative feedback but was that in the actual answer choice? like was one with positive feedback and the other negative feedback? cause i just remember answering like.. the body would do something to compensate for that ca deficiency.</p>
<p>I omitted 2 and got max wrong around 12. (not sure min wrong is 4) So can someone tell my score range?????</p>
<p>Should i cancel?
</p>
<p>Only if you wish to be in the running for the most OCD person on this list.</p>
<p>If that is truly your performance, you will receive a score in the 700's which is fine for admissions officers and colleges, just unacceptable to some of the extremists on this discussion.</p>
<p>here's the official email I got about reporting test errors:</p>
<p>In order to report a test error or ambiguity, please send a letter
including the following information:</p>
<p>The date and name of the test (SAT Reasoning or specific Subject test)
The section of the test involved
The test question (as well as you can remember it) along with an
explanation of your concern.</p>
<p>Also include your full name, mailing address, date of birth, test
registration number (if you know it), the test center name, test center
number and address.</p>
<p>Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of a bird?
A. 4 chambered heart
B. Respiratory system
C. Amniotic egg
D. Internal reproduction
E. teeth</p>
<p>For this question, the ambiguity is in "bird." In modern day birds, they don't have teeth, and that would be the right answer. However, Archaeopteryx, a bird that has existed 150 million years ago had teeth. </p>
<p>and the stupid lab questions ... the TAT mRNA and the hormone labs especially...</p>
<p>"Similar in size and shape to a European Magpie, it bore broad, rounded wings and a long tail. Archaeopteryx could grow to about half a meter, or 1.6 feet in length. Its feathers resembled the flight feathers of modern birds, suggesting not only capacity for flight, but also homeothermy. **Otherwise, its features were reptilian, with jaws lined with sharp teeth, **three 'fingers' ending in curved claws and a long bony tail. These features, which are consistent with theropod dinosaurs,... "</p>
<p>Big -
if someone wants to complain let him/her do it... if they don't it's fine... mostly, everyone is convinced that the test was really ambiguous - so why don't u let it be...</p>