<p>I do it quite frequently. </p>
<p>I was going to make some mention of how that method is easy if you know immediately which is the hard way and which is the easy way, but that it's more difficult if it's less obvious. Funny timing!</p>
<p>In that kind of situation, it's important to understand what overwhelmed you. Usually it seems as if something with a lot of information -- where you have to choose -- will get passed by because it's just "too much." If you took the job because you wanted to avoid having to pick through it, especially despite knowing and liking the people there AND the reputation, recognize that as an example of wanting to take the easy way out of a difficult situation. </p>
<p>I guess the main thing is to look at why you're turning away from one of your options. Is it because the other is more appealing to you (on any level), or because you can't get past the challenge of one and so go for the more straight-forward one?</p>
<p>I am a Grade A perfectionist and an English major. I am very good at what I do -- that is, analytical essays -- but I am afraid to give it the effort it deserves. I am a procrastinator precisely because of this: I know I can do well even when time is tight, but it's easy to justify a lower-than-expected grade if I do it this way because, well, I didn't do my best! So "my best" remains undefined and unproven, and is allowed to be its lofty, untested ideal.</p>
<p>I am still working to fix this one, and it helps that I actually care at this point. I am looking at going into grad school, so being able to write a complete, well-researched, thoroughly polished piece of analytical writing is very important to me. In this case, it's a matter of changing my focus from the immediate result to the long-term one, which is a general policy that might help you.</p>
<p>In the short-term, the program may have seemed much more challenging, and at the end you wouldn't have any money savings (versus the job) and maybe it would have felt more like just doing what you ought to. The job has immediate benefits: you get paid, you get a job to put on your resume (which for some reason always feels more "real" to college students as experience), and once it's over, it's over.</p>
<p>In the long-term, however, perhaps the program would have opened more doors for you, that you might've established a long-term working relationship with the company that you could take advantage of later on. The job's money would have been spent -- filtered into college expenses or parties or what have you -- and the contacts faded, so that all you're left with is a few months in a job that doesn't really contribute anything else to your experience or resume.</p>
<p>Perhaps it is not so cut-and-dry as that, and I expect it's not, but that is one way to look at it. I agree, though, it's MUCH harder to see it that way when the choice is sitting in front of you.</p>