<p>I have been accepted to the art schools that I have applied to and have received my financial aid award letters. They are all across the board. (Even the FAFSA info) All of the schools have around the same tuition, but each come with some different expenses regarding the cities in which they are and the things that are not included. (Living expenses, transportation, school supplies) Since they will all theoretically offer me same the education in which I am seeking, would it be more practical to go with the lowest price option? Should I go to my "dream school" with the higher price tag? Ask for more money? Apply to more schools to see if more financial aid is available? Any advice on the high tuition of art schools and colleges in general, experiences, art related career statistics after graduating, and any other advice! Thanks! </p>
<p>My short answer is, ‘yes, cost matters.’ Art related careers are some of the most competitive and offer some of the lowest salaries. Incurring high debt for an arts degree is foolhardy. After a lot of research, my opinion is that going into debt to spend 4 years at a private art college is not a wise investment. The biggest advantage that art schools offer is the job placement and industry contacts. In such a competitive field that can make a big difference. We don’t qualify for any financial aid and doubt our son will qualify for merit aid. Therefore, the most cost effective route for us is either an in-state university, or 2 years at cc and then 2 years at an art school.</p>