<p>Here's the dealio: </p>
<p>I'm going to have to take Math IIC no matter what. There's no question about that. I'm also planning on taking the Chemistry SAT II (bought the book already; can't return it). </p>
<p>My last SAT II is a toughie.</p>
<p>I got a 590 on the US History I took in June. I don't want to persue it; it brings back bad memories. </p>
<p>So my question on my options is this: Should I take the World History SAT II or Biology M?</p>
<p>For the Biology M I'd have more materials to work with, but the curve is more harsh. What is the curve like for the World History SAT II?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>OMG... take Biology instead of World history. Trust me on this, but if you really know your stuff for World History take the shot.... what have you got to lose? $20 i guess but what? Haha
But if you don't feel comfortabole taking world history, don't take it cause its a waste of money and the test itself was very difficult! They had many random pictures and quotes that you had to KNOW about. It's way to confusing. Biology was incredibly easier. Just read over the Barrons Biology book and you'll bomb the SAT II.
GOOD LUCK!!!!!!</p>
<p>I'll just take Bio then. E or M?</p>
<p>I'm not sure, are you stronger in Ecology or molecular? It depends. But if you do better in Ecology then thats better because most people don't do well in ecology.</p>
<p>Take Biology. It looks better on your college resume.</p>