<p>"Should Stanford Expand the Freshman Class?
Historically low acceptance rates leave many deserving students out." Article in the Stanford Alumni Magazine by Stanford president, John Hennessy.</p>
<p>
[quote]
... My primary rationale for asking this question is the dramatic growth in the number of applicantsa significant fraction of whom are prepared to do Stanford-caliber study. Stanford, like many universities, is experiencing a record number of applicants. For the Class of 2011, we received nearly 24,000 applicationsthe most ever. Our acceptance rate was 10.3 percentwhich we believe to be a record as well, albeit a record low. By comparison, for the class enrolling in 1970, we received 9,800 applications and accepted 22.4 percent.</p>
<p>As the number of applicants continues to increase, the quality of the students who apply also has risen, although more slowly than the total number of applicants. Test scores and grade-point averages are higher than ever; remarkable personal achievements, impressive contributions to the community and amazing creative accomplishments are now the norm. To cite one example: the percentage of applicants scoring the equivalent of a 700 on the SAT (adjusting for a recentering that happened in the 1990s) has increased by a factor of 1.12 for the verbal exam and a factor of 2.3 for the math exam.</p>
<p>Amid this rising tide of achievement, the size of our undergraduate population has remained nearly level for more than 35 years....
<p>Interesting. I feel that those are indeed good points. I think one reason that this hasn't happened is that we would need to get more profs, advising faculty, residence staff, etc.</p>
<p>"Announcing the move, Hennessy noted undergraduate numbers have been nearly level over the past 35 years".</p>
<p>
[quote]
Hennessy noted that the undergraduate population has remained nearly level over the last 35 years. In 2006, the total was 6,689, compared with 6,630 in 1980 and 6,221 in 1970.</p>
<p>He said it was time for alumni, faculty, students, trustees and admissions personnel to "begin a conversation" about the issue. He noted that even a small increase in the number of freshmen would have educational, social and financial consequences for the university.</p>
<p>"How would we ensure that we maintain the small classes and seminars for undergraduates?" he wrote. "Where would the resources come from to maintain the faculty-to-student ratio? Where would we house the additional students and how would we finance new housing? How would we provide the additional financial aid to ensure that Stanford remains need-blind?
<p>Do you get the feeling we alums are going to be asked for a lot of money to fund this?
I don't think Stanford will be allowed to make this decision in a vacuum. My friends (alums also) who live in Menlo Park and other areas right near campus have raised significant concerns about the impact Stanford's growth has made on traffic, etc. I'm not quite remembering the details, but I think Palo Alto had some concerns about the long-range plan.</p>
<p>It seems to me that growth at the hospital and Stanford mall has more of an impact on traffic. Most students don't bring cars to school and those that do tend to use them on weekends and not impact daily local commute traffic. Sand Hill is a clogged mess in the mornings, though!</p>
<p>I will defer to your analysis. I'm just glad I'm not facing Sand Hill or the Dumbarton Bridge every morning. Just the reunion traffic was bad enough.</p>
<p>"Notoriously selective Stanford considers accepting more students"</p>
<p>
[quote]
In 1970, Stanford received 9,800 applications and accepted 22.4 percent. For the class of 2011, which entered this fall, the university received almost 24,000 applications and accepted just 10.3 percent.</p>
<p>If other top universities expand, it could help calm the college admissions process, said Michael Behnke, vice president and dean of college enrollment at the University of Chicago, which recently expanded its undergraduate population by 28 percent.</p>
<p>"If other top universities increased in size ... that's a cumulative effect that's impressive," he said. "If you get so hyperselective, you don't take chances on people, and some of those people are the most interesting."...