<p>I liked the essay's point, but I thought that the many references to Yale were unnecessary and detracted from the main point.</p>
<p>why the subtle attacks on Yale? was it nescessary?</p>
<p>no the oh-so-subtle attacks on Yale weren't necessary.
And yeah they detracted from the main point.</p>
<p>But then again the essay has all the essential characteristics of a Byerly post - strong on info and <em>ahem!</em> on 'a certain lesser New Haven school' bashing.</p>
<p>"a certain lesser New Haven school"</p>
<p>hahahahaha! i don't think it's by byerly, but it does have a lot of his attitude in there.</p>
<p>Yes, Byerly would not say "a certain lesser New Haven school " without providing the stats to back that up.</p>
<p>What I find interesting about the article is:</p>
<p>"But while these increases in the applicant pool are important, they will be meaningless if the accepted class does not reflect this greater diversity. It is not enough to have more low-income students applying; Harvard must enroll talented, high-achieving low-income students so that the new class of first-years will reflect the diversity of the applications. "</p>
<p>I am waiting to see the number of low-income applicants they will admit.</p>
<p>What is Byerly's official title at harvard?</p>
<p>Lord of Propaganda.</p>
<p>Alumni interviewer?</p>
<p>Sphincter maximus .</p>
<p>Perhaps, Faux, you should limit youself to commenting on prom dresses.</p>
<p>"I am waiting to see the number of low-income applicants they will admit."</p>
<p>same here.</p>
<p>yeah me too. i'm one of those low income applicants :D</p>
<p>Here is something else that Byerly wrote. I know you all are going to be quite proud of him.</p>
<p>Posts #17 and #18 --> <a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=31884&page=1&pp=20%5B/url%5D">http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=31884&page=1&pp=20</a></p>
<p>hahahah sphincter maximus. i like you faux. keep posting. comment on whatever you like, especially Byerly, please.</p>