<p>I'm torn between the two, for various reasons. Could anyone help come up with some pros and cons for each? (I know "South America" is pretty broad, but I'm referring to the more politically stable regions- Argentina and Chile, e.g.)</p>
<p>Oh, and stuff like curriculum, etc isn't that important, as I'll be studying subjects that will be offered in both places. I'm more concerned with the overall quality of experience and more general pros and cons. Thanks!</p>
<p>South America would be quite a bit cheaper, but I think Spain would be more interesting in terms of culture and history.</p>
<p>Having been to Spain, Argentina is next on my list of countries I really want to visit. If you go to Argentina, you get the benefit of visiting a HUGE country that has a lot of amazing places to visit within its borders: Iguazú, the salt flats in the NW, Mendoza (wine country). Then the city/region of Buenos Aires itself is a city rich with history and culture. If you’re into government/politics at all BsAs is an amazing place to learn about the Latin American dictaduras (dictatorships) and how the present governments are dealing with the ramifications of that. Argentine tango is also always a treat to watch/experience. If you’re there you should definitely take a class!</p>
<p>Then again, Spain offers the ease of travel through Europe and even into Africa. There is an abundance of low-cost airlines in Europe and travel agencies. We went to Morocco for a weekend for 99 euros (included travel and lodging and tours), London for about 100 euros (flight), Italy for about 70 euros, Barcelona for 50. I studied in the south of Spain (Sevilla), and it was amazing to live in such an old city and see how the different cultures (Moorish, Jewish, Roman/Christian, Gitano) influenced the city’s architecture and culture. Flamenco, bull fights, arts, the cathedrals…</p>
<p>In both cases, the Spanish spoken is very interesting. Argentineans as well as Spaniards are known for their interesting accents.</p>