A couple thoughts on STEM at SAS…
Yes, the Amos science building is showing its age, and major renovations will be completed in 2019.
I can vouch for the strength of the STEM programs, even with the old facilities… most of the issues are purely cosmetic. The school has always been incredibly generous in purchasing materials, specimens, and equipment the kids needed for any research projects (or even just for fun… you can check a video drone out of the library, or use the laser cutter and 3D printers in the maker space without any fees for materials used).
The school doesn’t try to compete by leasing “the machine that goes ‘ping!’” (google it). In times when the soaring cost of education (and its value) is a battle line in the culture wars, it is reasonable to ask if you need a DNA sequencer or a scanning electron microscope to teach high school students science. Of course, they are amazing tools that allow you to dive deep into some fascinating research. It’s cool to say you’ve used them, really sounds impressive… and it may help inspire and excite students. All I’m saying is my kids were inspired and excited by the science they were doing without those tools. The teachers were deeply passionate (and remarkably knowledgable) about their fields, and cultivated a love of scientific inquiry along with teaching the foundational skills necessary (from the critical thinking used in formulating and testing hypotheses to the mundane methods of keeping clear, detailed lab notebooks).
On a related note I’ve had a couple parents this cycle ask me if STEM gets short shrift because SAS is a “liberal arts” school. If you aren’t familiar with the origins of the term, check out this [wikipedia entry on liberal arts](Liberal arts education - Wikipedia). Clearly, in modern usage, all the STEM fields are an integral, equally strong focus of any well rounded liberal arts school. In fact, if you look at [url=<a href=“http://www.reed.edu/ir/phd.html%5Dundergraduate”>http://www.reed.edu/ir/phd.html]undergraduate origins of doctoral degrees/url you’ll see that most of the schools in the top 10 list for churning out undergrads who go on to a doctorate in STEM fields are small liberal arts colleges. [Both of my kids are going to schools on that top 10 list, SAS prepared them incredibly well, PM for more details].
And while I’m on a soapbox about liberal arts colleges… When factor loading criteria for tenure, the small liberal arts colleges put the most weight on quality of teaching and mentorship, while universities most heavily weight faculty research/publishing productivity (and grant money pulled in). Personally, our family appreciates the focus on the highest quality of teaching. At the undergrad level, a broad survey of a field (preferably guided by an inspiring teacher), along with learning the habits of thought and the various means of exploring and analyzing that field are all you need for a great education… you don’t need to be doing the cutting edge research yourself… just get great mentoring while you do some basic research and get the hang of it. Then you can go on to a great graduate school (which will certainly have a machine that goes ‘ping!’).
But, as 7Dad says: if you really want your kids to have hands-on experience with a DNA sequencer in high school… SAS may not be right for your family.