STANFORD admit yield rises to 69% for Class of 2010

<p>[Note: story cites College Confidential!]</p>

<p>"Though still a long way from Harvard’s 80 percent, Stanford’s yield rate increased to a respectable 69 percent this year, up from 67 percent last year, according to Richard Shaw, dean of admission and financial aid. The number increased to approximately 88 percent for students who attended Admit Weekend or applied under the single-choice early action program.</p>

<p>...
Two years ago, the Office of Undergraduate Admission released statistics showing that 28 percent of students that declined Stanford chose Harvard instead, followed by 20 percent choosing Yale, 13 percent choosing MIT and 8 percent choosing Princeton; 31 percent of students chose other schools. Similar statistics for the Class of 2010 are not yet available, Shaw said.</p>

<p>With about one-third of Stanford acceptees declining their admission offers, these numbers beg the question: Why would students reject the sunny, happy, well-rounded institution? At a Faculty Senate meeting last month, Shaw said that the two primary reasons students did not attend Stanford after being accepted were financial cost and geographic location.</p>

<p>Stanford’s new financial aid policy is aimed at reducing the first constraint on students’ decisions. The University is eliminating parental contributions for families with total annual incomes of less than $45,000 and reducing parental contributions from families with total incomes between $45,000 and $60,000.</p>

<p>The second complaint, concerning the location of the University, will likely be harder to solve. In the post-admissions survey given to admits last year, non-enrolling admits wrote that they viewed Stanford as an environment as selective, challenging, intellectual, fun and impersonal — a wide range of perspectives on location.</p>

<p>At the Faculty Senate meeting, Shaw spoke about his plans to increase marketing to augment Stanford’s appeal across the country. He proposed using national and international Alumni Association groups to conduct interviews and outreach around the globe and to increase recruitment travel tenfold by joining the “Exploring College Options” consortium with Duke, Georgetown, Harvard and Penn, which travels to 300 cities in the fall of 2006 and spring of 2007.</p>

<p>...</p>

<p>While Shaw’s proposals may or may not increase Stanford’s yield rate, it is still important to understand why students might go elsewhere. On <a href="http://www.collegeconfidential.com%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.collegeconfidential.com&lt;/a>, a popular college admissions Web site, there are 17 pages of posts under the heading “Stanford or Harvard.” Jason Wong, a high school senior from San Francisco, chose Harvard over Stanford, even though Stanford offered him $100,000 more in financial aid than Harvard over four years.</p>

<p>....</p>

<p>“In terms of recruitment, I appreciated Stanford’s packet over Harvard’s because it was more celebratory and recognized the work of every admitted student; Harvard’s was more imposing,” Wong said. “Stanford offered me a way better financial aid package, which I had the hardest time letting go.</p>

<p>“But I guess Harvard’s location, history, and different location won me over,” he reflected. “I really want to experience the East Coast, for at least four years of my life. I also wanted to be in the Boston area, where I could potentially tap the resources and meet other students at other top colleges and universities in the area. I wanted something different, and I guess that was something that Stanford, although able to give me everything else, and maybe even more, couldn’t offer me.”</p>

<p>Chris Bennett, a high school senior from Arizona chose Stanford over Harvard because of its location, positive Admit Weekend experience and academic and social opportunities.</p>

<p>“I liked my future classmates and the people I met at Stanford more than the people at Harvard, having attended both admit weekends for a bit,” Bennett said. “People at Stanford seemed far more socially adept and relaxed, and people at Harvard seemed, well, frazzled. Finally, the Stanford campus is beyond amazing and blows Harvard’s out of the water, dorms and food seemed to be a bit better at Stanford and I’m from the Southwest so I figured that if I went out east in the cold, I might literally die.”</p>

<p>In trying to increase its yield rate, one initiative that the Stanford Admission Office instituted this year and will expand next year is the Likely Admit Program, which reaches out to the “most extraordinary” students early, before the regular review mailing date. These students received a letter in January and follow-up calls from Stanford faculty. This year, there were 61 “Super-star Academic Likelies” and 60 “Multicultural Likelies.”</p>

<p>These 121 students were expected to be admitted to every competitive institution in the country. Stanford tried to connect with them early to convince them of the University’s appeal as their best prospect. Shaw said that he was still analyzing the yield rates for these students, but the results “looked good.”</p>

<p>...</p>

<p><a href="http://daily.stanford.edu/tempo?page=content&id=20694&repository=0001_article%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://daily.stanford.edu/tempo?page=content&id=20694&repository=0001_article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>69% is a solid improvement for Shaw's first year, before he had a chance to really set up his infrastructure.</p>

<p>Onward, Stanford!</p>

<p>Outlook not so good for waitlisted students</p>

<p>Its odd that the story doesn't say how many matriculated. It says nothing at all about the waitlist or the compositon of the class. It is possible that now, 30 days after offers of admission were supposed to have been accepted, at least a few waitlistees are already incorporated in the number.</p>

<p>Note that 69% of 2,430 is 1,676 potential matriculants. If that exact number have indicated an intention to enroll at this stage, and with allowance for summer melt, there should be room for a few waitlistees.</p>

<p>From Shaw's report to the Faculty Senate on May 19:</p>

<p>"The class size is going to be 1657. We're also working towards the admissions of 60 transfer students into later years."</p>

<p>Toughest decision ever. i'm still in love with Stanford!</p>

<p>69% is definitely an improvement from 67% :). I think that financial reasons may be a very important factor to consider. Still good luck to all Waitlistees!!</p>

<p>PS: I wonder just how good those Super-star Academic Likelies are???</p>

<p>it would be interesting if that number means there were fewer common admits with other top schools of it Stanford did comparatively better. I am guessing it is the former since most top schools saw yield increase.</p>

<p>I'm not sure that is true. </p>

<p>The Harvard, Yale and Princeton yield rates should end up approximately at the same level they did last year. </p>

<p>So should Stanford's.</p>

<p>Yield rate projections in May are usually a bit higher than actual yield rates in September, after we see who shows up.</p>