<p>mikemac - I agree with you, but not completely. You say, regarding classes of 10-20 people, that: "if you think its just like going to Williams or Dartmouth or whatever at 1/5 the cost, it just 'aint so." and that HTC is "200 students taking some of their classes in an incredible setting of close contact with a faculty member, not 2000 students taking ALL of their classes in a great setting of 10-20 students." </p>
<p>But if you look at the common data set statistics, you will see that it is also not true for Williams and Dartmouth, the two schools you use as examples. At Williams, one-third of the classes are MORE than 20, and at Dartmouth, almost half the classes are more than 20.</p>
<p>But we can find lot of statistics to the contrary as well, and I'm not going to try to compare schools. A trend can be found if you sort the USN&WR tables by classes under 20: MOST of the higher percentage schools are private; MOST of the lower percentage schools are public.</p>
<p>But there are so many other factors. When I first started this process with my son, the elites sprang to mind: MIT, Rice, Brown, CMU (especially with CMU because of VERY, VERY strong legacy connections and the fact that we are annual contributors - not enough to make an admissions difference, but still shows an ongoing connection). My son's stats are somewhat high (NM-Commended, 1500-ish SATs) - not the best of the best, but in the top 3% of students by far - with excellent honors, activities, service and leadership, so some of these were not out of the question, especially at the lower end of the top 25-50 schools. We visited these schools and found out that they were not good fits for one or more of the following reasons: </p>
<p>[ul]
[<em>] My son did not want to attend a college smaller (or not much larger) than his high school.
[</em>] He wanted an academically diverse group of students, rather than a small slice of the SAT percentile ranks
[<em>] He wanted diversity in the majors offered so that in case he changed his mind about his current passion (happens, you know), he wanted lots of choices
[</em>] He had specific programs in mind that he wanted to major in, and most schools do not offer what he wanted
[li] He wanted a campus environment that he felt like he'd enjoy for the next four years; we visited a lot of schools in search of this criteria (lol).[/li][/ul]</p>
<p>Of course, his Mom and I kept pushing CMU or Rice. Nothing doing.</p>
<p>Not every kid is an LAC-type, and I don't think my son is one of them. I honestly think that where he landed is the best environment for him. There are a lot of opportunities there and there are some advantages (in terms of registration, private dorm rooms, first crack at internships, jumping directly into a major vs. the core curriculum classes, etc) of being a top dog. There are also major financial advantages, such as top merit aid. Many elites, while seemingly generous with financial aid, are not so generous with merit money; they don't have to be.</p>
<p>At Ohio, one of the things we did on campus was ask faculty members and other students about the attitude towards the HTC kids. In general it was deference and great, great respect. Two of the faculty people even said that in many ways these student have a lasting effect on some of the programs. I don't know if this is true or not, but I am convinced that one of the major reasons that my son was selected is that he has a lot of talent and skill in a certain area, and his department has plans to add a track in that discipline in the next year or so.</p>
<p>So, in conclusion, I will somewhat agree with your statement, but I also think that "eliteness" is not the whole story.</p>