<p>Okay, this has been bothering me for a while. Some of my friends were talking about UCLA/USC rivalry and somehow we ended up on the topic of Romeo and Juliet. </p>
<p>Soooo... the question is, if UCLA and USC were Romeo and Juliet, which one would be the guy and which would be the girl?</p>
<p>Oh, and could you include reasons why? I just like to see how people rationalize this.
So far, my friends and I are divided about 50/50.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>uhhhh… interesting</p>
<p>huh? and i thought that USC was gay!!</p>
<p>What does being gay have to do with an anthropomorphized school’s sex.</p>
<p>I actually thought of things like this a lot, going as far as to giving schools their own ethnicities and character traits. I eventually could not choose, and created a guy and girl version of the schools. UCLA’s kids would be half pan-Asian and a fourth Caucasian and a fourth <em>~</em>~diversity~<em>~</em>, and USC… Would be half Asian, half diversity, and whole brat (not necessarily rich)</p>
<p>When I have even more time, I might even draw these chars up. But Berkeley kids win, because that’s just my own little preference</p>
<p>USC isn’t mature enough for Romeo and Juliet :)</p>
<p>lol Tuna, nice… I thought it was funny at least. Even though it technically doesn’t matter whether you’re gay or not, you’re still a guy or a girl.</p>
<p>I’ve always thought USC being the alpha male while UCLA being the more reserved kind. </p>
<p>USC would be the All-American Football-Playing Boy while UCLA would be the cute Asian Schoolgirl.</p>
<p>THIS. NO.</p>
<p>I disagree but still it deserves a lmao</p>
<p>I’m gonna have to go with UCLA being the girl, because every year at the UCLA/USC football game we get ****ed.</p>
<p>and we handle balls very well.</p>
<p>so Bmop you’re saying football is a more masculine sport than basketball?</p>
<p>I actually think that UCLA would be the girl. Call me old fashioned, but baby blue kinda looks like a feminine color to me. USC’s harsh red and gold looks more masculine.</p>
<p>However, girls are better than boys, so once again, UCLA wins :)</p>
<p>^ It’s actually “true blue,” not “baby blue”. It’s a darker shade of powder blue.</p>
<p>I’d say USC is the guy because their mascot is a trojan, which is male, unless I’m mistaken. 
Many people also mistaken UCLA’s mascot, the bruin, as a baby bear.</p>
<p>And babies are all female?</p>
<p>The bruin bear is a strong, aggressive adolescent bear, not a baby =D
and baby blue, ehem, i mean true blue, is my favorite color. Ever seen a beautiful brand-new baby blue BMW (or other expensive luxury vehicle)? It’s a handsome vehicle.</p>
<p>I think UCLA is too mature, sophisticated, and evolved to be labeled as a certain gender. Only USC would banter about which school is which gender… so intellectual.</p>
<p>“I think UCLA is too mature, sophisticated, and evolved to be labeled as a certain gender.”</p>
<p>…wow so you’re saying things evolve to become unisex</p>
<p>I’m saying UCLA is too mature to play childish games like ascribing a gender label to a university.</p>
<p>you’re a barrel full of fun aren’t you.</p>
<p>gosh no, i’m like so boring. I literally stop fireworks from going off on the fourth of July, that’s how not fun I am.</p>
<p>nah I’m just kidding. assign genders all you want idc.</p>