<p>i put endured and impossible occurance</p>
<p>did anyone get 70/3 or something for one of the student-produced responses.</p>
<p>it was that area question with the square and the triangle attached to it</p>
<p>Yes, that is correct, fromdistantstar.</p>
<p>Please somebody tell me that Cecile answer was "regrettably underhanded" and the MLK one was "cynical" disagreement or something. Please...</p>
<p>i think the cecile answer was vain or inapt
im not sure what question you're talking about, flipsta_g, but i dont remember "regrettably underhanded"</p>
<p>i put impossible occurance, not cynical disagreement</p>
<p>impossible occurance, endured, complete agreement, 70/3</p>
<p>impossible occurance, endured, complete agree ment, inapt, vain...</p>
<p>no 70/3... that's about math</p>
<p>I thought complete agreement was too extreme... so, actually I chose cautiously optimistic</p>
<p>i did complete agreement then went back and changed it to cautious optimism (which i usually don't do, but i think it was right), but yeah-- complete was too extreme since ultimately the 2 writers had v. different opinions, but cautious optimism was kind of a weird way to put it. </p>
<p>also said endured (pretty confident about that one)</p>
<p>i think i said impossible occurance too.. </p>
<p>what were some other questions?</p>
<p>anyone remember Q's from the acting part?</p>
<p>what about that one about when she talked about "the dance of words" (lame)... the q asked for its signifcance i think i said something like "the things that can arise from words" or something along those lines</p>
<p>i think i put something motion...
i might be wrong</p>
<p>putting words into motion</p>
<p>i put that one, too</p>
<p>I think the answer was complete agreement. </p>
<p>The question asked for Passage II's author's opinion on a QUOTE that was included in Passage I...not on the position ultimately taken by Passage I. The quote given was almost identical to what Passage II said in its first paragraph...don't remember exactly, but both had something to do with MLK and his position on economics</p>
<p>yeah thats what i put, "the things words can set into motion" i think it was?</p>
<p>cryst4lx3-- yeah but passage II focused on MLK's negative aspects, while the quote did not.</p>
<p>passage 2 didn't focus on the negative aspects of MLK, it focused on the negative aspects of the public's interpretation of MLK's achievements</p>
<p>Wow am I the only one who understood the MLK passage</p>
<p>If you guys are unfamiliar with common writing approaches, it is quite common that an article start with a viewpoint that the author disagrees or contends with. That is the technique that the author of passage I used, If you guys didnt catch it.</p>
<p>The author of passage 1 started of with quotes and ideas from people saying that the essense of MLK's message has been lost. In the second paragraph, the author finally shows his viewpoint that people still capture the spirit of MLK Day and that we should show gratitude to those great civil right readers.</p>
<p>The author of Passage 2 largely disagrees with author 1's viewpoints. The thing that the author of Passage 2 agrees with are the QUOTES FROM THE FIRST PARAGRAPH where author1 gives the thoughts of people he disagrees BUT WHOM the author of passage 2 agrees with. Author 2 argues that people have abandoned the more mature aspects of MLK's idealogy for the "it makes me feel 'reassured' kinda stuff'/all the dream imagery stuff.</p>
<p>I didnt think the MLK passage was hard at all. You just had to understand how arguments are set up.</p>
<p>then, diamondt, what was the answer for the last question of MLK?</p>
<p>Okay... sent. completion: emote? The question had something to do with histrionic acting.</p>
<p>can you remind me of the question</p>
<p>i put impossible occurance and complete agreement.</p>
<p>diamondt- i understood this, but i still didnt think that author of 2 would COMPLETELY agree w/ the quotation, because the quotation still focused solely on MLK's positive accomplishments.</p>
<p>JamestotheZ- no, because in teh 1st paragraph of 2 the author talks about how MLK himself admitted his shortcomings, i.e. underestimating how entrenched racism was in society, and not taking stronger political action. (how the **** i'm remembering this i do not know).</p>
<p>basically, both complete agreement and cautious optimism were not ideal answers, but i'm still sticking w/ cautious optimism.</p>