<p>i don't remember the question was one after reassure...</p>
<p>what about the one beofre reassure?</p>
<p>complete agreement!</p>
<p>what was the LAST QUESTIon comparing passage 1 adn 2 in MLK??????
i put b</p>
<p>what was the context of the LAST QUESTION</p>
<p>DiammondT, thats what i thought as well, which was why it was so damned confusing for me to answer the questions. In some ways they agree, yet in others they disagree.</p>
<p>DiamondT got the point</p>
<p>The MLK isn't hard. What was hard was the Acting passage and possibly the Cecil MR. BeeBe passage</p>
<p>agh someone talk about math..that's what i want to know about :)</p>
<p>PS. i had 4 math sections...could anyone help me find out which one was experimental?</p>
<p>OYYEH and that writing question... on pollution and smog in cities...i thought it was C..but now i think it's no error :(</p>
<p>Dude wrong thread. Do your math stuff somewhere else</p>
<p>Ah I got one,</p>
<p>What was the one about "how does the author of passage one develop his argument compared with the author of passage two?"</p>
<p>I think the two choices I went between were something like "The author introduces King's 'I Have a Dream' speech" and "The author assumes that the reader has no prior knowledge of MLK"</p>
<p>What was really annoying was in one section there was two hard passages back to back. It was just impossible to read too deeply into them.</p>
<p>how can you be "optimistic" about what other person says it had to be complete agreement because you can not be optimistic about a statement but situation. i thought that complete agreement was abit on the extreme, but that quotation 100% agreed with the opinion of author 2</p>
<p>I hated that dancing passage..it sucked.</p>
<p>i think complete agreement is the correct one; as the last question suggested, the second passage backed the first. Both passages were in complete agreement.</p>
<p>bty, i think the theme of both passages was that the public adored MLK the dreamer, not realizing his other aspects</p>
<p>I had 5 verbal sections and had this passage. Which one was experimental? I didn't have anything about Nixon. I thought all the verbal passages were pretty easy except the Cecil passage. I still don't get how anyone could interpret the cutting the string as a metaphor for getting engaged, especially when Cecil was talking about getting engaged where the other dude was talking about her attachment to Ms. Bartlett. Anyway, I put "vain" because Cecil described his own argument as "conceited." Also, did anyone get that the author of passage 2 would consider the final statement of the author of passage 1 as "arrogant"?</p>
<p>PolishDude, you missed the point of passage 1</p>
<p>The author of passage up first introduced a quote and then set out to break it down. The quote said that the people have a simplistic view of MLK because they focus only on his "dream" speech and his early works while ignoring his more profound messages. The author of Passage 1 then goes to show that this simplistic view may not be so bad after all and he elaborates and lists some examples. This is why its cautious optimism</p>
<p>But the question was not eferring to the whole passage, only to the one quote in passage 1 that completely agreed with all of passage 2.</p>
<p>Yeah, I definitely agree with RefreshF5.</p>
<p>I definitely had no idea what the MLK passages meant. There goes the slim chance at 2400...
Oh well, I still have a 770 to fall back on.</p>
<p>frs, how can you have FIVE verbal sections?? There are three + 1 experimental for a maximum of four, right?</p>
<p>Okay guys, let's list all the answers for Martin Luther King.</p>
<p>suffer= endure
either cynical mistrust, complete agreement, or optimism
both should see Martin as a whole
simplistic
balance something with the quotation later life and earlier life
something about emblem</p>
<p>What's the sermon one
What is something the first passage does that the second author doesn't have?</p>