<p>“I understand that you don’t support loan relief for civil servants, but exactly who is it that you want teaching your kids? If there is no incentive to enter teaching, there are not enough dedicated bleeding heart liberals in the world willing to starve in order to do so” </p>
<p>Actually Mattsmom what you stated has been a substantial dilemma for some time, which has been massively compounded by the high fees and removal of basic consumer rights permitted to the corporate lenders. Last January the NEA published the article “My Debt My Life” In that essay they noted the incredible disparity between teacher pay and the attendant debts necessary to get a bachelors and a teachers certification. And they noted a very real concern that it may become impossible (or very difficult) to recruit teachers once wider knowledge of this problem becomes widespread. In my case I have taught specific teacher training courses and if I were still doing so quite truthfully I’d advise many not to become teachers at this point in time. </p>
<p>Granted there are loan relief programs for teachers who work in under served areas. But these are limited in scope, and have been limited further due to special lobbying by the corporate lenders. Primarily the loan programs which are effectively covered under these remission programs are the smaller federal programs, which have been marginalized in the recent past. And the core reality is that in places such as reservations the pay is so low that these loan remissions don’t mean all that much. For example on one reservation the starting pay for the teachers in the state supervised schools is all of 23,000 a year.
And not every teacher has the psychological resilience to remain long in such a place. </p>
<p>There are also substantial issues in academe about this problem. Many people who’ve obtained the necessary collection of alphabet soup to teach in academe are so bound to debt that their standard of living is at times not a great deal better than their students. (At my school often the distinction between some faculty and student cars is the faculty cars leak just a little bit less oil) </p>
<p>These issues likely indicate that another generation of tweed jacket idealists (or fools) may not be available to teach in the universities and colleges. And this problem is obviously compounded by the increased use of adjuncts. As a side note, in some areas the adjuncts are becoming much less qualified. The people with better credentials have gone to other things, or given up. </p>
<p>Kayf-It’s not necessarily a matter of one special group getting loan forgiveness, although that can be grating. For example many of us in academe really dislike the loan mediation programs given to the doctors and school teachers. </p>
<p>Whom ironically we train within a collegiate systems which condemns virtually everyone to unfair, excessive and often unsustainable debt. It’s reached the point that some in academe are engaging in a form of genteel guerrilla action against the whole system by such acts as removing corporate posters and letting students in on the truth of the matter despite administrative directives not to do so. </p>
<p>I remain at my current institution as a form of service, but I also remain because that school is at least trying to move to federal directs for the student loan components of financial aid. (Plus the economies so bad that leaving is a unappealing prospect). </p>
<p>The core issue is that this unworkable system has been allowed to propagate for so long that like a malady or pestilence people have become so accustomed to its presence that they genuinely believe nothing can be done.</p>