<p>.yellow.- </p>
<p>I had reps tell me that I had no chance with OVER a 3.8. It's good that your rep did give you some guidance. I found that, at least with the one's I spoke to, they were largely unhelpful. Yeah, I'm a current comm major. Is it all it's cracked up to be? Well, I guess. I really, really love the department (very small) and I honestly couldn't see myself doing anything else. I can't really suggest a different major because it's a really personal thing. However, if you're still interested in comm, definitely take some classes (there are some that are open to non-majors). Also, if there's a specific field you're interested in, try to find an extra curricular that helps you get practical experience (which are generally open to any major). For instance, do AdTeam if you're interested in advertising or DB if you're interested in journalism. There are lots of ways to pursue comm-related stuff without being in the major (this really goes for any field). </p>
<p>Tallkell-</p>
<p>Yeah, I go to UCLA currently. I know that meeting with reps has no bearing on admissions because they've told me so themselves. They don't keep a list or anything of people they've spoken to...they're there solely to guide you and offer insight, reassurance, etc. Also, because comm does admissions seperately (literally....the take all of the applications that come into the main office for comm and bring them to their own office), there's no chance that the comm person reading your app would have any interaction with the rep you spoke to. </p>
<p>I meant random in a colloquial sense. You're right, their method is pretty consistant. However, like I stated previously, the level of the bar is determined by the group of applicants. One year there could be a ton of 4.0s, and another year maybe no one applying has a 4.0. It's random in that you don't know your competition and you don't know where you stand among the others.</p>
<p>They ask for an essay because that's standard for a UC application. While comm conducts admissions seperately (for various reasons), they're still a part of the college and they use the college app. HOWEVER, because they have sovereignty over the applications they receive, they are able to determine their own standards for reviewal. </p>
<p>I know that it's hard to believe that they make decisions based off of numbers...but I don't know what to tell you. Other people around here most definitely have been accepted with low gpas. Those people weren't applying to comm, though, and comm is an ENTIRELY different game. And really, I'm sure a very, very select few have been admitted to comm with below a 3.8 due to whatever circumstances, but it's not the norm and I would never want to lead someone to believe that it is. Comm is very cut and dry with what they want. High Grades. Course Completion. This is because space is extremely limited and they only want people who they know will succeed in the program. The weight of ECs is debateable. I'd say that if they demonstrated a strong commitment to the field, then possibly, but otherwise no. </p>
<p>Ultimately, do I know for sure that they don't look at essays? No, of course not. But I DO know the department's standards and I know the quality of other accepted Comm majors. If they do, in fact, consider essays, I would still say that they bear little, if any, weight on their decisions. And also, I'd like to add that I actually really HATE that they only admit based on grades. I've encountered a lot of comm kids who can barely string along a sentence but who had high CC grades so they got in. It sucks, but it's the way it is.</p>
<p>/Sorry for the novella. Lots to cover.</p>