<p>Sorry you were having a bad day, LW. Hope things are looking up for you, and that the burners are turned down a bit more today. The flames were pretty intense yesterday.</p>
<p>People look at and/or choose to post in different threads for different reasons. Some posters go to the “new posts” link and see what is being talked about. Some go to specific areas of interest or what have you, and may choose to post for any of a variety of reasons. Posters reading this thread may be looking at other Texas schools as well, including Rice, and I felt your comments about Rice were unkind and unfair, especially based on such limited information/experience. For example, Rice is fortunate to have a large endowment, and has the opportunity to use it in many ways. There is nothing wrong with making the buildings or resources attractive. You seriously criticizing a school for having nice facilities, resources and curb appeal? The ultimate goal is to attract students, and if that is part of it (great facilities with great resources) that is a good thing. Rice, until recently, had an old, dumpy HS-looking gym, with limited fitness resources for students. It was kind of a joke. The work-out facilities for the athletes, now thats another story!! Wonderful facilities for them. The gym was in serious need of updating or replacement, and the new recreation center is a huge plus for the school.</p>
<p>Also, who knows if monies donated for new buildings and facilities had some strings attached? If some benefactor wants to donate millions for a new facility (eg the new Duncan and McMurtry residential colleges) and wanted, for example, to require the bathrooms to have purple toilet seats (I am making this up!) as a contingency in their donation, then purple toilet seats it is!! When I was in college, som old biddy left a broccoli endowment. We had broccoli at more meals than I would like to remember. But she left the $$ and indicated how she wanted it spent.</p>
<p>If I recall correctly, the students participated in the design of Duncan Hall, the School of Engineering, so it has some pretty interesting features. I believe they just completed a new addition to the Engineering school as well. This is all good (except for purple toilet seats…). If you are turned off by attractive facilities, then you might find the old thread “schools with the ugliest buildings” thread amusing. I think , IIRC, Oral Roberts had a particularly unattractive set of buildings. But students choosing to go to ORU probably arent selecting it based on its curb appeal. And if you think the Rice students have some air of entitlement, then you definitely didn’t spend much time getting to know the students there. Never heard that said about Rice students. Are there some wealthy kids there? Sure. That is true anywhere. So what. Not sure why you are making an issue out of attractive facilites and good groundskeeping. Do you prefer ugly, rundown facilites with dirt, barren fields or overgrown weeds? Rice, and its students, pride itself on the number of trees on their campus. There is always a bit of a to-do when they have to cut some down for new construction. They care about their grounds and resources. Again, all good. Taking care of their facilities is not likely to be at the expense of other services to their students and faculty, so what is the problem?</p>
<p>So why did I post here? To present a fair and balanced opinion of Rice, which is a phenomenal school. It is as valid a reason to post as any. Why did you feel the need to take a swipe at Rice yesterday in this thread about TSU? MOWC asked you about your d’s thoughts on Rice in post #11. You responded, and so did I. Threads take all sorts of twists and turns, which makes for interesting reading. No oneother than the mods get to dictate what is or isn’t discussed, or who can or can’t post in any thread. I think thats a fair statement too.</p>
<p><strong><em>cross posted with MOWC</em></strong></p>