"The Declining Value of Your College Degree"

<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121623686919059307.html?mod=yhoofront%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121623686919059307.html?mod=yhoofront&lt;/a>

[quote]

The Declining Value 
Of Your College Degree
By GREG IP
A four-year college degree, seen for generations as a ticket to a better life, is no longer enough to guarantee a steadily rising paycheck.
Just ask Bea Dewing. After she earned a bachelor's degree -- her second -- in computer science from Maryland's Frostburg State University in 1986, she enjoyed almost unbroken advances in wages, eventually earning $89,000 a year as a data modeler for Sprint Corp. in Lawrence, Kan. Then, in 2002, Sprint laid her off.</p>

<p>For decades, the typical college graduate's wage rose well above inflation. But no longer. In the economic expansion that began in 2001 and now appears to be ending, the inflation-adjusted wages of the majority of U.S. workers didn't grow, even among those who went to college. The government's statistical snapshots show the typical weekly salary of a worker with a bachelor's degree, adjusted for inflation, didn't rise last year from 2006 and was 1.7% below the 2001 level.</p>

<p>College-educated workers are more plentiful, more commoditized and more subject to the downsizings that used to be the purview of blue-collar workers only. What employers want from workers nowadays is more narrow, more abstract and less easily learned in college.</p>

<p>To be sure, the average American with a college diploma still earns about 75% more than a worker with a high-school diploma and is less likely to be unemployed. Yet while that so-called college premium is up from 40% in 1979, it is little changed from 2001, according to data compiled by Jared Bernstein of the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal Washington think tank.
Most statistics he and other economists use don't track individual workers over time, but compare annual snapshots of the work force. That said, this trend doesn't appear due to an influx of lower-paid young workers or falling starting salaries; Mr. Bernstein says when differences in age, race, marital status and place of residence are accounted for, the trend remains the same.</p>

<p>A variety of economic forces are at work here. Globalization and technology have altered the types of skills that earn workers a premium wage; in many cases, those skills aren't learned in college classrooms. And compared with previous generations, today's college graduates are far more likely to be competing against educated immigrants and educated workers employed overseas.</p>

<p>The issue isn't a lack of economic growth, which was solid for most of the 2000s. Rather, it's that the fruits of growth are flowing largely to "a relatively small group of people who have a particular set of skills and assets that lots of other people don't," says Mr. Bernstein. And that "doesn't necessarily have that much to do with your education." In short, a college degree is often necessary, but not sufficient, to get a paycheck that beats inflation.</p>

<p>Economists chiefly cite globalization and technology, which have prompted employers to put the highest value on abstract skills possessed by a relatively small group, for this state of affairs. Harvard University economists Lawrence Katz and Claudia Goldin argue that in the 1990s, it became easier for firms to do overseas, or with computers at home, the work once done by "lower-end college graduates in middle management and certain professional positions." This depressed these workers' wages, but made college graduates whose work was more abstract and creative more productive, driving their salaries up.</p>

<p>Indeed, salaries have seen extraordinary growth among a small number of highly paid individuals in the financial sector -- such as fund management, investment banking and corporate law -- which, until the credit crisis hit a year ago, had benefited both from the buoyant financial environment and the globalization of finance, in which the U.S. remains a leader.</p>

<p>Richard Spitzer is one of those beneficiaries. He received his undergraduate degree in East Asian studies in 1995 from the College of William and Mary and graduated from Georgetown University's law school in 2001. The New York firm for which he works, now called Dewey & LeBoeuf, has a specialty in complex legal work for insurance companies. There, Mr. Spitzer has developed an expertise in "catastrophe bonds." An insurance company sells such bonds to investors and pays them interest, unless an earthquake, a hurricane or unexpected surge in deaths occurs.</p>

<p>Experts in these bonds are "probably a rarefied species -- there's only a few law firms that do them," says Mr. Spitzer, 35 years old. He typically spends two to four months on a single deal, ensuring that details like timing of payments or definition of the triggering event are precise enough to avoid disputes or default.</p>

<p>Mr. Spitzer's salary has doubled to $265,000 since joining in 2001, in line with salaries similar firms pay.</p>

<p>But not all law graduates are so fortunate; many, especially those from less-prestigious schools, have far lower salaries and less job security. Similarly, some computer-science graduates strike it rich. But their skills are not as rare as they were in the early 1980s, when the discipline took off, and graduates today must contend with competition from hundreds of thousands of similarly qualified foreign workers in the U.S. or overseas.
That helps explain Ms. Dewing's experience. She was raised in a family that prized education. Both her parents went to college on the G.I. Bill, which pays tuition costs for servicemen and some dependents. Four of their six children earned college degrees. In 1979, she earned a bachelor's degree in government and politics from George Mason University in Virginia. Several years later, then a single mother, she decided to get a degree in computer science.</p>

<p>Her first job out of college was with the federal government, earning about $35,000 in today's dollars. "For 16 years I had no trouble at all finding jobs," she said. Earlier this decade she ended up at Sprint designing databases -- a specialty called "data modeling" that isn't widely taught in schools and usually requires hands-on experience.</p>

<p>In 2002 Sprint, reeling from the collapse of the telecommunications industry, initiated a wave of layoffs that eventually totaled 15,000 workers in 13 months, Ms. Dewing among them. She remained in the Kansas City area, posting her r</p>

<p>Thanks for such "encouraging" info on a college message board. Sheesh!</p>

<p>Its true though. More and more people got the hint that college was "necessary." This generation is scared. Those who hate school take 6 years, flounder around, and then end up with a college degree from no-name university because they think a degree is the key to riches. They never do any internships, no real work experience, no volunteering, nothing. A generation ago these same type of people would be out in the work force gaining experience, giving them something to write about in their resume or interview. Even in the article it said that dude who went to Georgetown was rollin' in the dough. And the girl ended up getting a job because she had work experience. </p>

<p>In summary, more BA and BS's are out there but a good recipe for success (not gauranteed) is a degree from a semi-prestigious college and work experience.</p>

<p>Start...: That's pure rubbish! Are you saying a degree from Harvard plus work experience will be inferior than semi-prestigious college and work experience? Hello? Are we living in the same planet here?</p>

<p>^ Learn to read. He never said that.</p>

<p>He said a good recipe for success, you know! My definition of success is different. Well, maybe our definition of success is not the same. But from your other posts, I know you are a wise man; So, I know what you are trying to say here and I am not gonna say it so that I will not ignite any flame.</p>

<p>
[quote]
"There is enough competition for entry-level positions that employers are going to ask, 'What else have you done in your life besides go to college?'" she says. "And in information technology, a portfolio of hands-on experience with programming is a really good thing to have."

[/quote]
</p>

<p>So, in other words, what everybody in technical fields here has always said. You need to stay on top of advances in your field to stay in it.</p>

<p>Very true. Job security is such a difficult thing to maintain, particularly in this type of market. People cling on to their jobs for dear life! Anyone entering IT (or any other field for that matter!) should be aware of this. The upside is that despite globalization and outsourcing, there remain a shortage of highly skilled technical people. If you can stay on top of technological advances, if ever (god forbid) you should lose your job, you should be able to snatch up a new one if you've got some experience to back it up.</p>

<p>I really can't think of any field that is totally stagnant in terms of what skills are required. I really think every field has its own ever changing demands. Physicians might have the seeming security of their MDs and licenses, but they face obvious job pressures of their own, perhaps even more so because there is so much potential for growth and change within the field of science. And in every procedure they undertake and every patient they deal with, their situation is fairly precarious. So don't let it worry you because it's a concern for everyone. </p>

<p>Just work hard and find your niche in whatever field you find yourself in. As always, do the best you can do! :D</p>

<p>I was a little bit unclear for that so I apologize. I meant a GENERAL recipe for success is go to AT LEAST a semi-prestigious university and gain AT LEAST some work experience. OBVIOUSLY, if you get a degree from Harvard or another elite school and have work experience, you've set yourself up to be in a good position as well.</p>

<p>The article made it seem like ALL degrees were losing value. What I'm saying is, of course if you have a degree from no-name U then it'll be harder to find a good job. That is precisely what a lot of people have these days: degrees from no name U. More no-name degrees = higher probability of more "college graduates" who are jobless = everyone thinking that degrees are losing value.</p>

<p>And what would constitute a "semi-prestigous" university? Flagship states schools and along that tier?</p>