<p>Anyways, I was browsing thorough Steve Sailer's archives when I came across this post:
<a href="http://isteve.blogspot.com/2007/09/my-review-of-james-r-flynns-what-is.html%5B/url%5D">http://isteve.blogspot.com/2007/09/my-review-of-james-r-flynns-what-is.html</a></p>
<p>Which is very interesting.</p>
<p>If you don't know about the Flynn Effect => <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect%5B/url%5D">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect</a></p>
<p>Basically, it is the observation that average IQ tests of different nations have increased with respect to time, which has caused some people to critique the utility of IQ tests. Apparently, Flynn did not join in the attacks himself and now defends IQ testing against the attacks caused by the observation of this effect (which has pretty much stopped for some of the most developed countries).</p>
<p>One implication is that as variance due to environment decreases (due to the fact that most people in developed countries are materially well off, as compared to where they were decades ago), the variance due to genetics can only increase.</p>
<p>==
That being said, IQ tests are bound on misinterpretations. They measure something on the GROUP level, but can SOMETIMES be inaccurate on the individual level.</p>